ArticleRespiratory medicine2024
Longitudinal changes in lung function following post-9/11 military deployment in symptomatic veterans.
Article in Respiratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Medical problems in military personnel associated with burn pit exposure: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Deployment Exposures, Respiratory Symptoms, and the Limits of Resting Lung Function.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Article
- Military Inhalational Exposures Outside the Theater of Conflict and Chronic Respiratory Symptoms.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Effect of prednisone on woodsmoke-induced sputum inflammation in healthy volunteers: A randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleExposure to burn pit smoke, desert and combat dust, and diesel exhaust during military deployment to Southwest Asia and Afghanistan (SWA) can cause deployment-related respiratory diseases (DRRDs) and may confer risk for worsening lung function after return.
methodsStudy subjects were SWA-deployed veterans who underwent occupational lung disease evaluation (n = 219). We assessed differences in lung function by deployment exposures and DRRD diagnoses. We used linear mixed models to assess changes in lung function over time.
resultsMost symptomatic veterans reported high intensity deployment exposure to diesel exhaust and burn pit particulates but had normal post-deployment spirometry. The most common DRRDs were deployment-related distal lung disease involving small airways (DDLD, 41%), deployment-related asthma (DRA, 13%), or both DRA/DDLD (24%). Those with both DDLD/DRA had the lowest estimated mean spirometry measurements five years following first deployment. Among those with DDLD alone, spirometry measurements declined annually, adjusting for age, sex, height, weight, family history of lung disease, and smoking. In this group, the forced expiratory volume in the first second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio declined 0.2% per year. Those with more intense inhalational exposure had more abnormal lung function. We found significantly lower estimated FVC and total lung capacity five years following deployment among active duty participants (n = 173) compared to those in the reserves (n = 26).
conclusionsMore intense inhalational exposures were linked with lower post-deployment lung function. Those with distal lung disease (DDLD) experienced significant longitudinal decline in FEV1/FVC ratio, but other DRRD diagnosis groups did not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.