ArticleAddictive behaviors2024
Characterizing alcohol cue reactive and non-reactive individuals with alcohol use disorder.
Article in Addictive behaviors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04249882 (A Novel Human Laboratory Model for Screening Medications for Alcohol Use Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Novel Human Laboratory Model for Screening Medications for Alcohol Use Disorder
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of a GHSR blocker in people with alcohol use disorder.JCI insight · 2024Trial
- Article
- When cues take the wheel: cue-control across alcohol use disorder, binge-eating disorder, gambling disorder, and internet gaming disorder.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- The alcohol cue-exposure paradigm as a screening tool for alcohol use disorder medication development: A critical review.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2025Review
- Who is alcohol cue-reactive? A machine learning approach.Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeExposure to alcohol-related cues is thought to elicit a conditional response characterized by increased craving in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD). In the context of AUD research, it is important to consider that not all individuals with an AUD are alcohol cue reactive. This study systematically examined subjective alcohol cue reactivity and its clinical and drinking correlates in individuals with an AUD enrolled in a human laboratory pharmacotherapy trial.
methodsIndividuals with current moderate-to-severe AUD (N = 52) completed a standard alcohol cue exposure paradigm and individual difference assessments as part of a human laboratory pharmacotherapy trial (NCT04249882). We classified participants as cue reactive (CR+) and cue non-reactive (CR-), as indicated by self-reported, subjective alcohol urge, and examined group differences in baseline clinical characteristics and drinking outcomes over the course of the trial.
resultsTwenty participants (38%) were identified as CR+, while 32 participants (62%) were identified as CR-. The CR+ and CR- groups did not differ in baseline drinking and AUD clinical characteristics, but the groups differed in race composition (p = 0.02) and smoking prevalence (p = 0.04) such that the CR+ group had lower prevalence of smokers. The CR+, compared with the CR-, group drank more during the trial titration period (p = 0.03). Both groups reduced drinking across the trial (p's < 0.001), but the CR+ group exhibited a smaller reduction in drinking, compared with the CR- group (time x group, p = 0.029; CR-, p < 0.0001; CR+: p = 0.01).
conclusionResults indicate that cue reactivity is a heterogenous construct. Recognizing this heterogeneity, and the clinical factors associated with it, is critical to advancing this paradigm as an early efficacy marker in AUD research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.