ArticleBlood advances2024
Acalabrutinib-based regimens in frontline or relapsed/refractory higher-risk CLL: pooled analysis of 5 clinical trials.
Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Real-world effectiveness and safety of acalabrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: Multicentre experience.British journal of haematology · 2026Observational
- Acalabrutinib in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Pharmacology and Emerging Clinical Perspectives.European journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Zanubrutinib for the treatment of patients with del(17p) and/or TP53 CLL/SLL: analysis across clinical studies.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Real-world overall survival comparison between first-line Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors in treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma: An analysis of Veterans Health Administration data.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- Richter-like transformation of CLL/SLL after a temporary hold of ibrutinib: A case report.Leukemia research reports · 2026Article
- Real-world efficacy and safety outcomes of acalabrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: primary results of a French multicentre observational study (NAOS).Annals of hematology · 2025Observational
- Targeted therapies overcome the poor prognosis of stereotyped Subset#2 chronic lymphocytic leukemia : a real-world multicentric study.Leukemia · 2025Article
- Management strategies for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia harbouring complex karyotype.British journal of haematology · 2025Review
- Relative efficacy of systemic treatments for patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a network meta-analysis according to 17p deletion/TP53 mutations.Blood research · 2025Article
- Acalabrutinib in High-Risk Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Naïve Patients: An Italian Multicenter Retrospective Observational Real-Life Experience.Hematological oncology · 2025Article
- Risk-stratification in frontline CLL therapy: standard of care.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024Review
- Navigating the changing landscape of BTK-targeted therapies for B cell lymphomas and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
abstractBefore targeted therapies, patients with higher-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), defined as del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation (TP53m), unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region genes (uIGHV), or complex karyotype (CK), had poorer prognosis with chemoimmunotherapy. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) have demonstrated benefit in higher-risk patient populations with CLL in individual trials. To better understand the impact of the second-generation BTKi acalabrutinib, we pooled data from 5 prospective clinical studies of acalabrutinib as monotherapy or in combination with obinutuzumab (ACE-CL-001, ACE-CL-003, ELEVATE-TN, ELEVATE-RR, and ASCEND) in patients with higher-risk CLL in treatment-naive (TN) or relapsed/refractory (R/R) cohorts. A total of 808 patients were included (TN cohort, n = 320; R/R cohort, n = 488). Median follow-up was 59.1 months (TN cohort) and 44.3 months (R/R cohort); 51.3% and 26.8% of patients in the TN and R/R cohorts, respectively, remained on treatment at last follow-up. In the del(17p)/TP53m, uIGHV, and CK subgroups in the TN cohort, median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were not reached (NR). In the del(17p)/TP53m, uIGHV, and CK subgroups in the R/R cohort, median PFS was 38.6 months, 46.9 months, and 38.6 months, respectively, and median OS was 60.6 months, NR, and NR, respectively. The safety profile of acalabrutinib-based therapy in this population was consistent with the known safety profile of acalabrutinib in a broad CLL population. Our analysis demonstrates long-term benefit of acalabrutinib-based regimens in patients with higher-risk CLL, regardless of line of therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.