Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38639939›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

ICG-Fluorescence Imaging for Margin Assessment During Minimally Invasive Colorectal Liver Metastasis Resection.

Friso B Achterberg, Okker D Bijlstra, Maxime D Slooter, Babs G Sibinga Mulder, Mark C Boonstra, Stefan A Bouwense, Koop Bosscha, Mariëlle M E Coolsen, Wouter J M Derksen, Michael F Gerhards and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Navigated hepatic tumor resection using intraoperative ultrasound imaging.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Friso B AchterbergDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Okker D BijlstraDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Maxime D SlooterDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Babs G Sibinga MulderDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Mark C BoonstraDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Stefan A BouwenseNUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Koop BosschaDepartment of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Den Bosch, the Netherlands.
Mariëlle M E CoolsenDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Wouter J M DerksenDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein/Regionaal Academisch Kankercentrum Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Michael F GerhardsDepartment of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Paul D GobardhanDepartment of Surgery, Amphia Ziekenhuis, Breda, the Netherlands.
Jeroen HagendoornDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht/Regionaal Academisch Kankercentrum Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Daan LipsDepartment of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Hendrik A MarsmanDepartment of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Babs M ZonderhuisDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lissa WullaertDepartment of Surgery, Amphia Ziekenhuis, Breda, the Netherlands.
Hein PutterDepartment of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jacobus BurggraafDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
J Sven D MieogDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Alexander L VahrmeijerDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Rutger-Jan SwijnenburgDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Dutch Liver Surgery Group
Leiden University Medical Center · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLMaastricht University · NLOLVG · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Unintended tumor-positive resection margins occur frequently during minimally invasive surgery for colorectal liver metastases and potentially negatively influence oncologic outcomes. Objective: To assess whether indocyanine green (ICG)-fluorescence-guided surgery is associated with achieving a higher radical resection rate in minimally invasive colorectal liver metastasis surgery and to assess the accuracy of ICG fluorescence for predicting the resection margin status. Design, Setting, and Participants: The MIMIC (Minimally Invasive, Indocyanine-Guided Metastasectomy in Patients With Colorectal Liver Metastases) trial was designed as a prospective single-arm multicenter cohort study in 8 Dutch liver surgery centers. Patients were scheduled to undergo minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robot-assisted) resections of colorectal liver metastases between September 1, 2018, and June 30, 2021. Exposures: All patients received a single intravenous bolus of 10 mg of ICG 24 hours prior to surgery. During surgery, ICG-fluorescence imaging was used as an adjunct to ultrasonography and regular laparoscopy to guide and assess the resection margin in real time. The ICG-fluorescence imaging was performed during and after liver parenchymal transection to enable real-time assessment of the tumor margin. Absence of ICG fluorescence was favorable both during transection and in the tumor bed directly after resection. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was the radical (R0) resection rate, defined by the percentage of colorectal liver metastases resected with at least a 1 mm distance between the tumor and resection plane. Secondary outcomes were the accuracy of ICG fluorescence in detecting margin-positive (R1; <1 mm margin) resections and the change in surgical management. Results: In total, 225 patients were enrolled, of whom 201 (116 [57.7%] male; median age, 65 [IQR, 57-72] years) with 316 histologically proven colorectal liver metastases were included in the final analysis. The overall R0 resection rate was 92.4%. Re-resection of ICG-fluorescent tissue in the resection cavity was associated with a 5.0% increase in the R0 percentage (from 87.4% to 92.4%; P < .001). The sensitivity and specificity for real-time resection margin assessment were 60% and 90%, respectively (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.751; 95% CI, 0.668-0.833), with a positive predictive value of 54% and a negative predictive value of 92%. After training and proctoring of the first procedures, participating centers that were new to the technique had a comparable false-positive rate for predicting R1 resections during the first 10 procedures (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.44-4.24). The ICG-fluorescence imaging was associated with changes in intraoperative surgical management in 56 (27.9%) of the patients. Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter prospective cohort study, ICG-fluorescence imaging was associated with an increased rate of tumor margin-negative resection and changes in surgical management in more than one-quarter of the patients. The absence of ICG fluorescence during liver parenchymal transection predicted an R0 resection with 92% accuracy. These results suggest that use of ICG fluorescence may provide real-time feedback of the tumor margin and a higher rate of complete oncologic resection.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIndocyanine GreenMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedOptical ImagingProspective StudiesIndocyanine Green

Identifiers

PMID38639939
PMCPMC11031680
OpenAlexW4394952757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.