ArticleRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Congenital brain malformations].
Article in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical issueMalformations of the central nervous system belong to the most common developmental disorders in humans. The clinical presentation of brain malformations is nonspecific including developmental delay, hypotonia, and/or epilepsy. The great heterogeneity concerning etiology, mechanisms of development and morphology is challenging for diagnosis and classification of brain malformations. Thereby recognizing specific malformations is essential for optimal patient management and prognostic evaluation. The aim of this article is to give an overview of several clinically relevant brain malformations occurring from different disrupted developmental processes in brain formation. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
methodsSeveral brain malformations are already diagnosed during routine ultrasound in pregnancy. However pre- and postnatal magnetic resonance imaging remains the gold standard in detecting the partially subtle changes and to classify the malformations. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Advances in pre- and postnatal neuroimaging techniques and increasing investigation of genetic mechanisms underlying brain formation and its abnormalities have led to a better understanding of embryologic development and pathogeneses of brain malformations.
conclusionBesides patient's history and clinical phenotype, neuroimaging plays a key role in diagnosis. Not always a specific diagnosis can be made, but neuroimaging patterns often enable a focused genetic testing and therefore are revolutionary for etiologic and prognostic assignment. Basic knowledge of brain development facilitates understanding and classifying of structural brain abnormalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.