ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024
Multimodality Fusion Strategies in Eye Disease Diagnosis.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-driven multimodal retinal imaging for early detection and risk stratification of vascular and neurodegenerative diseases.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Tumor or Inflammation? How Multi-Modality Image Fusion and Shear Wave Elastography Can Help Solve the Diagnostic Dilemma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From Pathophysiology to Innovative Therapies in Eye Diseases: A Brief Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The quest for early detection of retinal disease: 3D CycleGAN-based translation of optical coherence tomography into confocal microscopy.Biological imaging · 2024Article
- Construction and Interpretability of a Multimodal Deep Learning Model of Electronystagmography-Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography for Early Screening of Alzheimer's Disease.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multimodality fusion has gained significance in medical applications, particularly in diagnosing challenging diseases like eye diseases, notably diabetic eye diseases that pose risks of vision loss and blindness. Mono-modality eye disease diagnosis proves difficult, often missing crucial disease indicators. In response, researchers advocate multimodality-based approaches to enhance diagnostics. This study is a unique exploration, evaluating three multimodality fusion strategies-early, joint, and late-in conjunction with state-of-the-art convolutional neural network models for automated eye disease binary detection across three datasets: fundus fluorescein angiography, macula, and combination of digital retinal images for vessel extraction, structured analysis of the retina, and high-resolution fundus. Findings reveal the efficacy of each fusion strategy: type 0 early fusion with DenseNet121 achieves an impressive 99.45% average accuracy. InceptionResNetV2 emerges as the top-performing joint fusion architecture with an average accuracy of 99.58%. Late fusion ResNet50V2 achieves a perfect score of 100% across all metrics, surpassing both early and joint fusion. Comparative analysis demonstrates that late fusion ResNet50V2 matches the accuracy of state-of-the-art feature-level fusion model for multiview learning. In conclusion, this study substantiates late fusion as the optimal strategy for eye disease diagnosis compared to early and joint fusion, showcasing its superiority in leveraging multimodal information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.