ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2024
Clinical Significance of Coronary Arterial Dominance: A Review of the Literature.
Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research on Internet plus continuing nursing under dual heart medical model after percutaneous coronary intervention.Medicine · 2025Trial
- Coronary Dominance on Coronary CT Angiography: Prevalence and Potential Implications for Electrocardiographic Correlation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Referral patterns and findings of patients undergoing CT coronary angiography.Qatar medical journal · 2026Article
- The incremental value of invasive coronary angiographic characteristics in predicting the success of retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention via invisible collateral channels.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- A Synergistic Multi-Scale Attention and Composite Feature Extraction Network for Coronary Artery Segmentation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Consequences of Right Heart Disease for Cardiac Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias: Cellular and Structural Mechanisms.CJC open · 2025Review
- Real-Time Coronary Artery Dominance Classification from Angiographic Images Using Advanced Deep Video Architectures.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Identification of NSTE-ACS patients with totally occluded infarct-related artery: the role of the SAVE risk score in improved risk stratification.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary dominance describes the anatomic variation of coronary arterial supply, notably as it relates to perfusion of the inferior cardiac territories. Differences in the development and outcome in select disease states between coronary dominance patterns are increasingly recognized. In particular, observational studies have identified higher prevalence of poor outcomes in left coronary dominance in the setting of ischemic, conduction, and valvular disease. In this qualitative literature review, we summarize anatomic, physiologic, and clinical implications of differences in coronary dominance to highlight current understanding and gaps in the literature that should warrant further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.