ArticleOncology reports2024
[Corrigendum] Long non‑coding RNA H19 regulates LASP1 expression in osteosarcoma by competitively binding to miR‑29a‑3p.
Article in Oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following the publication of the above article, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that, for the cell invasion assay experiments shown in Fig. 2D on p. 5, there appeared to be an overlapping section of data comparing between the Sao‑2/Control and MG‑63/siH19 panels, such that these data had been derived from the same original source where the panels were intended to portray the results from differently performed epxeriments. Upon examining their original data, the authors have realized that, in Fig. 2D, an inadvertent error was made in the copying and pasting of the two groups of pictures, resulting in the image belonging to the Saos‑2 cell experiment being mistakenly pasted as the image for the MG‑63 cell experiment. The authors carefully checked the original pictures and the experimental record, and found that the two groups of cells were close to the same morphology. The corrected version of Fig. 2, containing data from an alternatively performed experiment for Fig. 2D, is shown on the next page. Note that the error did not affect the overall conclusions reported in the paper. All the authors agree with the publication of this corrigendum, and are grateful to the Editor of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.