Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38639086›Full record

ArticleSoft matter2024

Surface charge density and induced currents by self-charging sliding drops.

Pravash Bista, Aaron D Ratschow, Amy Z Stetten, Hans-Jürgen Butt, Stefan A L Weber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Soft matter, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pravash BistaMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3807-1704
Aaron D RatschowInstitute for Nano- and Microfluidics, TU Darmstadt, Peter-Grünberg-Str. 10, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6614-5008
Amy Z StettenMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3339-343X
Hans-Jürgen ButtMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5391-2618
Stefan A L WeberMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3052-326X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous charge separation in drops sliding over a hydrophobized insulator surface is a well-known phenomenon and lots of efforts have been made to utilize this effect for energy harvesting. For maximizing the efficiency of such devices, a comprehensive understanding of the dewetted surface charge would be required to quantitatively predict the electric current signals, in particular for drop sequences. Here, we use a method based on mirror charge detection to locally measure the surface charge density after drops move over a hydrophobic surface. For this purpose, we position a metal electrode beneath the hydrophobic substrate to measure the capacitive current induced by the moving drop. Furthermore, we investigate drop-induced charging on different dielectric surfaces together with the surface neutralization processes. The surface neutralizes over a characteristic time, which is influenced by the substrate and the surrounding environment. We present an analytical model that describes the slide electrification using measurable parameters such as the surface charge density and its neutralization time. Understanding the model parameters and refining them will enable a targeted optimization of the efficiency in solid-liquid charge separation.

Identifiers

PMID38639086
PMCPMC11220910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.