Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38638992›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Experimental investigation and analytical verification of buckling of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced sandwich beams.

Emrah Madenci, Yasin Onuralp Özkılıç, Alireza Bahrami, Ceyhun Aksoylu, Muhammad Rizal Muhammad Asyraf, Ibrahim Y Hakeem, Alexey N Beskopylny, Sergey A Stel'makh, Evgenii M Shcherban, Sabry Fayed

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Emrah MadenciDepartment of Civil Engineering, Necmettin Erbakan University, 42090, Konya, Turkey.
Yasin Onuralp ÖzkılıçDepartment of Civil Engineering, Necmettin Erbakan University, 42090, Konya, Turkey.
Alireza BahramiDepartment of Building Engineering, Energy Systems and Sustainability Science, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, University of Gävle, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden.
Ceyhun AksoyluDepartment of Civil Engineering, Konya Technical University, 42250, Konya, Turkey.
Muhammad Rizal Muhammad AsyrafEngineering Design Research Group, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia.
Ibrahim Y HakeemDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Alexey N BeskopylnyDepartment of Transport Systems, Faculty of Roads and Transport Systems, Don State Technical University, 344003, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Sergey A Stel'makhDepartment of Unique Buildings and Constructions Engineering, Don State Technical University, Gagarin Sq. 1, 344003, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Evgenii M ShcherbanDepartment of Engineering Geology, Bases, and Foundations, Don State Technical University, 344003, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Sabry FayedCivil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El Sheikh, 33516, Egypt.
Don State Technical University · RUNecmettin Erbakan University · TRKafrelsheikh University · EGKonya Technical University · TRNajran University · SAUniversity of Gävle · SEUniversity of Technology Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon nanotube (CNT) reinforcement can lead to a new way to enhance the properties of composites by transforming the reinforcement phases into nanoscale fillers. In this study, the buckling response of functionally graded CNT-reinforced composite (FG-CNTRC) sandwich beams was investigated experimentally and analytically. The top and bottom plates of the sandwich beams were composed of carbon fiber laminated composite layers and hard core. The hard core was made of a pultruded glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) profile. The layers of FG-CNTRC surfaces were reinforced with different proportions of CNT. The reference sample was made of only a pultruded GFRP profile. In the study, the reference sample and four samples with CNT were tested under compression. The largest buckling load difference between the reference sample and the sample with CNT was 37.7%. The difference between the analytical calculation results and experimental results was obtained with an approximation of 0.49%-4.92%. Finally, the buckling, debonding, interlaminar cracks, and fiber breakage were observed in the samples.

Indexed as

BucklingCarbon fiber-reinforced polymerCarbon nanotubeComposite sandwich beamFlexural behaviorGlass fiber-reinforced polymerStiffnessStrength

Identifiers

PMID38638992
PMCPMC11024553
OpenAlexW4393558050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.