Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38638939›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2024

Understanding Multiprogram Take-Up of Safety Net Programs Among California Families.

Marisa M Tsai, Joseph A Yeb, Kaitlyn E Jackson, Wendi Gosliner, Lia C H Fernald, Rita Hamad

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marisa M TsaiNutrition Policy Institute, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Oakland, California.
Joseph A YebPublic Health and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kaitlyn E JacksonDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Wendi GoslinerNutrition Policy Institute, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Oakland, California.
Lia C H FernaldCommunity Health Sciences Division, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Rita HamadDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Computational Social Science Training ProgramT32HD101364 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Jennifer Ahern, PATRICK T BRADSHAW · 2020 to 2026
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD101364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The U.S. safety net, which provides critical aid to households with low income, is composed of a patchwork of separate programs, and many people with low income benefit from accessing <1 program. However, little is known about multiprogram take-up, that is, participation conditioned on eligibility. This study examined individual and multiprogram take-up patterns and sociodemographic factors associated with multiprogram take-up of U.S. safety net programs. Methods: The Assessing California Communities' Experiences with Safety Net Supports study interviewed Californians and reviewed their 2019 tax forms between August 2020 and May 2021. Take-up of safety net programs was calculated among eligible participants ( Results: Take-up was highest for Medicaid (90.6%) and lowest for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (57.5%). Among people who received benefits from at least 1 other program, take-up ranged from 81.7% to 84.8% for the Earned Income Tax Credit; 54.4%-62.0% for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; 74.3%-80.1% for Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children; and 89.7%-98.1% for Medicaid. Having a lower income and being younger were associated with concurrent take-up of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children. Among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children recipients, having higher income, being older, and being primarily English speaking were associated with Earned Income Tax Credit take-up. Conclusions: Individual and multiprogram take-up vary between programs and by sociodemographic factors. Findings suggest opportunities to increase take-up of potentially synergistic programs by improving cross-program coordination, data sharing, and targeted recruitment of underenrolled subgroups (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children).

Indexed as

Earned Income Tax Credithealth equityMedicaidSocial safety netSpecial Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and ChildrenSupplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

Identifiers

PMID38638939
PMCPMC11024909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.