ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024
Competing risks data in clinical oncology.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk of fracture among lung cancer survivors by cancer treatment modality: A population-based retrospective cohort study.Journal of bone oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3-5 on Mortality and Morbidity Outcomes in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity-Score-Matched Cohort Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Comparative atrial fibrillation risk across Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in B-cell malignancies: A nationwide population-based study.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Incidence Patterns and Prognostic Impact of Lung-Involving Multiple Primary Cancers: A 10-Year Hospital-Based Cohort Study.Thoracic cancer · 2026Article
- From Cardioprotection to Trial Design: Rethinking Cardiac Safety in Oncology.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Challenges identified from trends in mortality among patients with gastrointestinal cancer in the United States.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Ten-Year Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer-Competing Risks and Patient Vulnerability: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Novel Composite Indicator SIRI_HDL_ALB for Prognostic Prediction in Patients with Distal Cholangiocarcinoma After Radical Resection.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Real-World Clinical Outcomes and Biopsy Patterns of Older Patients with Unresected Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Primary Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Uncertainties in outcome modelling in radiation oncology.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Review
- Surgery Reduces Cancer-specific Death in Elderly Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A SEER-Based Competing-Risk Analysis.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Competing risks data analysis plays a critical role in the evaluation of clinical utility of specific cancer treatments and can inform the development of future treatment approaches. Although competing risks data are ubiquitous in cancer studies, competing risks data are infrequently recognized and competing risks data analysis is not commonly performed. Consequently, efficacy of specific treatments is often incompletely and inaccurately presented and thus study results may be interpreted improperly. In the present article, we aim to enhance awareness of competing risks data and provide a general overview and guidance on competing risks data and its analysis using cancer clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.