Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38638807›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2024

Episodic memory assessment: effects of sex and age on performance and response time during a continuous recognition task.

James O Clifford, Sulekha Anand, Franck Tarpin-Bernard, Michael F Bergeron, Curtis B Ashford, Peter J Bayley, John Wesson Ashford

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01123018 (Screening for Memory Studies), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01123018 completednot on this map

Screening for Memory Studies

TypeobservationalSponsorJohn Wesson Ashford JrRan2007 to 2023Enrolled1ConditionsMemory Loss, Memory Deficits, Dementia, Alzheimer DiseaseArmsMemtrax Memory screening test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

James O CliffordDepartment of Psychology, College of San Mateo, San Mateo, CA, United States.
Sulekha AnandDepartment of Biological Sciences, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, United States.
Franck Tarpin-BernardHAPPYneuron, Inc., Lyon, France.
Michael F BergeronDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT, United States.
Curtis B AshfordMemTrax, LLC, Redwood City, CA, United States.
Peter J BayleyVA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
John Wesson AshfordVA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
VA Palo Alto Health Care System · USAssociation pour l'Utilisation du Rein Artificiel dans la région Lyonnaise · FRCognizant (United States) · USCollege of San Mateo · USSan Jose State University · USUniversity of Hartford · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Continuous recognition tasks (CRTs) assess episodic memory (EM), the central functional disturbance in Alzheimer's disease and several related disorders. The online MemTrax computerized CRT provides a platform for screening and assessment that is engaging and can be repeated frequently. MemTrax presents complex visual stimuli, which require complex involvement of the lateral and medial temporal lobes and can be completed in less than 2 min. Results include number of correct recognitions (HITs), recognition failures (MISSes = 1-HITs), correct rejections (CRs), false alarms (FAs = 1-CRs), total correct (TC = HITs + CRs), and response times (RTs) for each HIT and FA. Prior analyses of MemTrax CRT data show no effects of sex but an effect of age on performance. The number of HITs corresponds to faster RT-HITs more closely than TC, and CRs do not relate to RT-HITs. RT-HITs show a typical skewed distribution, and cumulative RT-HITs fit a negative survival curve (RevEx). Thus, this study aimed to define precisely the effects of sex and age on HITS, CRs, RT-HITs, and the dynamics of RTs in an engaged population. Methods: MemTrax CRT online data on 18,255 individuals was analyzed for sex, age, and distributions of HITs, CRs, MISSes, FAs, TC, and relationships to both RT-HITs and RT-FAs. Results: HITs corresponded more closely to RT-HITs than did TC because CRs did not relate to RT-HITs. RT-FAs had a broader distribution than RT-HITs and were faster than RT-HITs in about half of the sample, slower in the other half. Performance metrics for men and women were the same. HITs declined with age as RT-HITs increased. CRs also decreased with age and RT-FAs increased, but with no correlation. The group over aged 50 years had RT-HITs distributions slower than under 50 years. For both age ranges, the RevEx model explained more than 99% of the variance in RT-HITs. Discussion: The dichotomy of HITs and CRs suggests opposing cognitive strategies: (1) less certainty about recognitions, in association with slower RT-HITs and lower HIT percentages suggests recognition difficulty, leading to more MISSes, and (2) decreased CRs (more FAs) but faster RTs to HITs and FAs, suggesting overly quick decisions leading to errors. MemTrax CRT performance provides an indication of EM (HITs and RT-HITs may relate to function of the temporal lobe), executive function (FAs may relate to function of the frontal lobe), processing speed (RTs), cognitive ability, and age-related changes. This CRT provides potential clinical screening utility for early Alzheimer's disease and other conditions affecting EM, other cognitive functions, and more accurate impairment assessment to track changes over time.

Indexed as

cognitive assessmentdementiaepisodic memorymemoryresponse time

Identifiers

PMID38638807
PMCPMC11024362
OpenAlexW4393944577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.