ArticleCureus2024
Cardiac Tamponade Due to Pericardial Effusion Following Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter: A Single-Institution Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The applications, complications, and management of neonatal peripherally inserted central catheters (n-PICCs): a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Utilizing POCUS for the Identification and Management of PICC Line-Associated Cardiac Tamponade.POCUS journal · 2025Article
- Analysis of the preventive effect of upper limb exercise combined with intelligent grip ball on venous thrombosis in patients with peripheral central venous catheters.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlthough the use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) has many advantages, misplacement can lead to serious life-threatening complications such as pericardial effusion (PCE) and cardiac tamponade (CT). This report aims to describe four cases of CT resulting from misplaced PICC, which were successfully managed.
methodsRetrospective analysis of neonates who required PICC insertion and had PCE leading to CT in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at The Children's Hospital 2, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, during the year 2022.
resultsFour cases involved preterm infants at 28-30 weeks gestational age, weighing between 900-1,500 grams. The PCE/CT developed between 3 and 24 days following PICC insertion. The abrupt onset with clinical manifestations that showed hemodynamic instability included sudden deterioration, lethargy, apnea, bradycardia, pale skin, and cardiovascular collapse. We use cardiac point of care ultrasound (POCUS) to assess the condition of these patients and guide the pericardiocentesis procedure. The analysis of the aspirated fluid used for PCE/CT treatment is consistent with the component of parenteral nutrition. No deaths were encountered.
conclusionNeonates presenting sudden deterioration following PICC insertion should undergo POCUS to prompt identifying PCE/CT. Timely diagnosis via POCUS, prompt pericardiocentesis, and prevention of misplaced PICC-associated serious complications are crucial. Monitoring of the PICC position twice a week is recommended to avoid life-threatening complications. Additionally, incorporating POCUS for identifying the tip of PICC rather than relying solely on X-ray should be considered in the current protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.