Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38638750›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multicenter, Observational Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of Akynzeo® in the Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in India.

Sudeep Gupta, Chandrakanth Mv, Boben Thomas, Ghanshyam Biswas, Sumant Gupta, Palanki S Dattatreya, Sagar Bhagat, Saiprasad Patil, Sumit Bhushan, Hanmant Barkate

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sudeep GuptaMedical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre/Hospital & Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, IND.
Chandrakanth MvMedical Oncology, Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, Kolkata, IND.
Boben ThomasMedical Oncology, Caritas Hospital, Kottayam, IND.
Ghanshyam BiswasMedical Oncology, Sparsh Hospital & Critical Care, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Sumant GuptaMedical Oncology, Sarvodaya Hospital & Research Centre, Faridabad, IND.
Palanki S DattatreyaMedical Oncology, Renova Hospitals, Secunderabad, IND.
Sagar BhagatGlobal Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited, Mumbai, IND.
Saiprasad PatilGlobal Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited, Mumbai, IND.
Sumit BhushanGlobal Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited, Mumbai, IND.
Hanmant BarkateGlobal Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited, Mumbai, IND.
Nethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital · INSparsh Hospital · INGlenmark Pharmaceuticals (India) · INKrishna Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is a common and unpleasant treatment-related side effect reported by cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Akynzeo® or NEPA (NEtupitant + PAlonosetron) is the first fixed combination of netupitant and palonosetron that targets both critical pathways involved in emesis while providing a convenient, single oral dose therapy. The current study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of NEPA in a real-world setting in India. Methodology This was an open-label, multicenter, prospective, single-arm study conducted at six different locations across India. The study included patients of either gender, aged ≥18 years, naive to chemotherapy, scheduled to receive highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC/MEC), and scheduled to receive oral NEPA, as determined by the investigator. Results A total of 360 people were screened and enrolled in the study. HEC was prescribed to 289 (81.64%) patients, while MEC was prescribed to 65 (18.36%) patients. Complete response was achieved in 94.92% of patients during the acute phase, 95.20% during the delayed phase, and 93.22% during the overall phase. During the overall phase, 92.73% and 95.38% of patients on the HEC and MEC regimens, respectively, achieved complete response. Adverse events were reported in 3.88% of patients. Conclusions Oral NEPA was found to be effective in the Indian real-world setting, eliciting a >90% complete response with HEC and MEC regimens across the acute, delayed, and overall phases.

Indexed as

hecmecnauseanepanetupitantvomiting

Identifiers

PMID38638750
PMCPMC11024873
OpenAlexW4392959078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.