Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38638735›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Identifying Depression and Anxiety: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Fabeha Zafar, Laraib Fakhare Alam, Rafael R Vivas, Jada Wang, See Jia Whei, Sameer Mehmood, Amirali Sadeghzadegan, Mohit Lakkimsetti, Zahra Nazir

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease: Bridging mechanisms, management, and emerging innovations.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fabeha ZafarInternal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi, PAK.
Laraib Fakhare AlamInternal Medicine, Ministry of Health, Kuwait, KWT.
Rafael R VivasNutrition, Food and Exercise Sciences, Florida State University College of Human Sciences, Tallahassee, USA.
Jada WangMedicine, St. George's University, Brooklyn, USA.
See Jia WheiInternal Medicine, Sriwijaya University, Palembang, IDN.
Sameer MehmoodMedicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, PAK.
Amirali SadeghzadeganGeneral Medicine, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, TUR.
Mohit LakkimsettiInternal Medicine, Mamata Medical College, Khammam, IND.
Zahra NazirInternal Medicine, Combined Military Hospital, Quetta, Quetta, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative literature review undertakes a comprehensive examination of the burgeoning field, tracing the development of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered tools for depression and anxiety detection from the level of intricate algorithms to practical applications. Delivering essential mental health care services is now a significant public health priority. In recent years, AI has become a game-changer in the early identification and intervention of these pervasive mental health disorders. AI tools can potentially empower behavioral healthcare services by helping psychiatrists collect objective data on patients' progress and tasks. This study emphasizes the current understanding of AI, the different types of AI, its current use in multiple mental health disorders, advantages, disadvantages, and future potentials. As technology develops and the digitalization of the modern era increases, there will be a rise in the application of artificial intelligence in psychiatry; therefore, a comprehensive understanding will be needed. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct using keywords for this. In a recent review of studies using electronic health records (EHR) with AI and machine learning techniques for diagnosing all clinical conditions, roughly 99 publications have been found. Out of these, 35 studies were identified for mental health disorders in all age groups, and among them, six studies utilized EHR data sources. By critically analyzing prominent scholarly works, we aim to illuminate the current state of this technology, exploring its successes, limitations, and future directions. In doing so, we hope to contribute to a nuanced understanding of AI's potential to revolutionize mental health diagnostics and pave the way for further research and development in this critically important domain.

Indexed as

ai chatbotartificial intelligence in medicinedepressiongeneralized anxiety disorder (gad)machine learning (ml)

Identifiers

PMID38638735
PMCPMC11025697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.