ArticleMalaysian orthopaedic journal2024
Accuracy of Femoral Component External Rotation with all Burr Robotic Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Article in Malaysian orthopaedic journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis of femoral component rotational accuracy in robotic-assisted versus navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: External rotation of femoral component is controversial in Total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of our study is to assess the precision of femoral component external rotation in Robotic Assisted All Burr TKA. Materials and methods: This is a prospective study of 30 cases who underwent All Burr Robotic Assisted TKA at our institute, RNH hospital. Inclusion criteria were primary and secondary osteoarthritis of the knee and exclusion criteria were revision and partial knee replacement. On Navio robotic system femoral external rotation was planned as per medio-lateral flexion gap balancing and executed with burr. Post-operative CT scan was done in all patients to assess intra-operative planned femoral external rotation. Results: Out of 30 cases, 20 were female and 10 were male. Mean age was 66.06±7.43 years. On Navio the planned external rotation of femoral component was 2.86±1.16. Average of femoral component external rotation on postoperative CT scan was 3.11±1.16. The mean deviation of achieved femoral component external rotation from planned external rotation was -0.24 to ±0.28. Only 37% patients required 3° external rotation. Correlation between planned and achieved femoral component external rotation was significant, positive and very strong as indicated by r=0.97 and p=0.0001. Conclusion: All Burr Robotic Assisted TKA provides near accurate femoral component external rotation as planned on Navio with deviation of less than 0.3° between planned and achieved external rotation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.