Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38638594›Full record

ReviewJB & JS open access

Orthopaedic Personal Statement Thematic Review: Does Topic Matter?

Fong Nham, Tannor Court, Kevin Steelman, Chaoyang Chen, Andrew Tsai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fong NhamDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6028-846X
Tannor CourtDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan.
Kevin SteelmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orlando Health, Orlando, Florida.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9115-6155
Chaoyang ChenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5196-8781
Andrew TsaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0106-6987

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In the process of applying into medical residency, the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) requires critical documents including a personal statement. Utility of personal statements are questioned based on suspected congruity of the content within personal statements among those who apply into orthopaedic surgery. The goal of this study was to identify and categorize the thematic elements found within the 2021 to 2022 personal statements of orthopaedic surgery applicants at a single institution and assess a correlation to interview invitation. Methods: Deidentified personal statements among 2021 to 2022 ERAS applicants were reviewed by the research staff and categorized into one of the proposed themes. Three hundred ninty-four applications passed initial screening filters, and 49 applicants were granted an interview. Proposed themes that were collected included: family of physician, working with hands, history of injury/disease, prior professional setting, immigration/travel, athlete/sports, reapplication, previous clinical experience, and other. χ Results: There was a significant difference in theme selection for an applicant's personal statement (χ Conclusion: Despite a significant focus of the application process into orthopaedic surgery residencies, our single-institution study did observe specific themes that were more prevalent. There was an increased interview rate between applicant's themes for immigration/travel and family of physician when comparing groups. Immigration/travel was also identified as the only significant theme associated with interview invitation which may be due to the recent emphasis on promoting diversity within orthopaedic surgery.

Identifiers

PMID38638594
PMCPMC11023608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.