ReviewFrontiers in psychology2024
Advancing equity in cross-cultural psychology: embracing diverse epistemologies and fostering collaborative practices.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bibliometric analyses of climate psychology: critical psychology and climate justice perspectives.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Pooled it
- To Whom National Culture Matters: An Analysis of Mentions of Countries in Titles and Abstracts in Social and Personality Psychology and Related Fields From 1990 to 2020.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2026Article
- How global is our research on child and adolescent mental health? A worldwide concentration and imbalance - and an opportunity for JCPP to take the lead in disseminating globally diverse research.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026Article
- Institutional trust and psychological synergy effects in China-Central Asia cross-cultural cooperation: a structural equation modeling analysis.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- The need for cultural sensitivity and epistemic justice in applying neuroscience advances in the Global South.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Impact of a comprehensive two-year research capacity intervention with sexual and reproductive health researchers in Sub-Saharan Africa.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Applying Critical Discourse Analysis to Cross-Cultural Mental Health Recovery Research.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Rethinking knowledge systems in psychology: addressing epistemic hegemony and systemic obstacles in climate change studies.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Thai Burnout Assessment Tool (T-BAT): Translation, validity, and reliability testing in nurses.Belitung nursing journal · 2025Article
- Psychosocial work environment beyond WEIRD: meta-analytic and psychometric evidence on the Job Content Questionnaire.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- I have to keep going for my kids (Women's health (London, England)Article
- Transformative strategies for enhancing women's resilience to climate change: A policy perspective for low- and middle-income countries.Women's health (London, England)Review
- Co-designing an International Nursing Course on Workplace Violence in Ethiopia, Sweden, and Tanzania: A Collective Autoethnography.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychology, and cross-cultural psychology (CCP) in particular, plays a pivotal role in understanding the intricate relationship between culture and human behavior. This paper sheds light on the challenges of inequity and marginalization, especially concerning scholarship from the Global South, which have roots in historical colonial practices. It highlights how intellectual extractivism and the predominance of Western research methodologies often overlook the contributions of Global South scholars and indigenous ways of knowing. Such imbalances risk narrowing the scope of psychological inquiry, privileging American and European perspectives, and undermining the richness of global human experiences. This paper calls for a shift toward more equitable collaborations and the recognition of diverse epistemologies. By advocating for genuine representation in research and valuing local knowledge, it proposes pathways for a more inclusive and authentic exploration of human behavior across cultures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.