Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38638504›Full record

ArticleHealthcare technology letters

Real-time surgical tool detection with multi-scale positional encoding and contrastive learning.

Gerardo Loza, Pietro Valdastri, Sharib Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gerardo LozaSchool of Computing, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences University of Leeds West Yorkshire UK.
Pietro ValdastriSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences University of Leeds West Yorkshire UK.
Sharib AliSchool of Computing, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences University of Leeds West Yorkshire UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1313-3542

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time detection of surgical tools in laparoscopic data plays a vital role in understanding surgical procedures, evaluating the performance of trainees, facilitating learning, and ultimately supporting the autonomy of robotic systems. Existing detection methods for surgical data need to improve processing speed and high prediction accuracy. Most methods rely on anchors or region proposals, limiting their adaptability to variations in tool appearance and leading to sub-optimal detection results. Moreover, using non-anchor-based detectors to alleviate this problem has been partially explored without remarkable results. An anchor-free architecture based on a transformer that allows real-time tool detection is introduced. The proposal is to utilize multi-scale features within the feature extraction layer and at the transformer-based detection architecture through positional encoding that can refine and capture context-aware and structural information of different-sized tools. Furthermore, a supervised contrastive loss is introduced to optimize representations of object embeddings, resulting in improved feed-forward network performances for classifying localized bounding boxes. The strategy demonstrates superiority to state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods. Compared to the most accurate existing SOTA (DSSS) method, the approach has an improvement of nearly 4% on mAP and a reduction in the inference time by 113%. It also showed a 7% higher mAP than the baseline model.

Indexed as

computer visionmedical image processingobject detectionsurgery

Identifiers

PMID38638504
PMCPMC11022231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.