Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38638500›Full record

ArticleHealthcare technology letters

Revisiting instrument segmentation: Learning from decentralized surgical sequences with various imperfect annotations.

Zhou Zheng, Yuichiro Hayashi, Masahiro Oda, Takayuki Kitasaka, Kensaku Mori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhou ZhengGraduate School of Informatics Nagoya University Chikusa-ku, Nagoya Aichi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5593-2281
Yuichiro HayashiGraduate School of Informatics Nagoya University Chikusa-ku, Nagoya Aichi Japan.
Masahiro OdaGraduate School of Informatics Nagoya University Chikusa-ku, Nagoya Aichi Japan.
Takayuki KitasakaSchool of Information Science Aichi Institute of Technology Yagusa-cho, Toyota Aichi Japan.
Kensaku MoriGraduate School of Informatics Nagoya University Chikusa-ku, Nagoya Aichi Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper focuses on a new and challenging problem related to instrument segmentation. This paper aims to learn a generalizable model from distributed datasets with various imperfect annotations. Collecting a large-scale dataset for centralized learning is usually impeded due to data silos and privacy issues. Besides, local clients, such as hospitals or medical institutes, may hold datasets with diverse and imperfect annotations. These datasets can include scarce annotations (many samples are unlabelled), noisy labels prone to errors, and scribble annotations with less precision. Federated learning (FL) has emerged as an attractive paradigm for developing global models with these locally distributed datasets. However, its potential in instrument segmentation has yet to be fully investigated. Moreover, the problem of learning from various imperfect annotations in an FL setup is rarely studied, even though it presents a more practical and beneficial scenario. This work rethinks instrument segmentation in such a setting and propose a practical FL framework for this issue. Notably, this approach surpassed centralized learning under various imperfect annotation settings. This method established a foundational benchmark, and future work can build upon it by considering each client owning various annotations and aligning closer with real-world complexities.

Indexed as

federated learningimperfect annotationsrobotic instrumentsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID38638500
PMCPMC11022234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.