Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38638450›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2024

CellSNAP: a fast, accurate algorithm for 3D cell segmentation in quantitative phase imaging.

Piyush Raj, Santosh Kumar Paidi, Lauren Conway, Arnab Chatterjee, Ishan Barman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Piyush RajJohns Hopkins University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1488-9475
Santosh Kumar PaidiJohns Hopkins University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Lauren ConwayJohns Hopkins University, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-9349-5574
Arnab ChatterjeeJohns Hopkins University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Ishan BarmanJohns Hopkins University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.

Funding

Determination of functional and molecular biomarkers of treatment resistance with multimodal optical spectroscopyR01CA238025 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI RAJARAM, NARASIMHAN · 2019 to 2024
$2.0M
Next-generation optical nanoprobes: From quantum biosensing to cellular monitoringR35GM149272 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ISHAN BARMAN · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA238025NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM149272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Three-dimensional quantitative phase imaging (QPI) has rapidly emerged as a complementary tool to fluorescence imaging, as it provides an objective measure of cell morphology and dynamics, free of variability due to contrast agents. It has opened up new directions of investigation by providing systematic and correlative analysis of various cellular parameters without limitations of photobleaching and phototoxicity. While current QPI systems allow the rapid acquisition of tomographic images, the pipeline to analyze these raw three-dimensional (3D) tomograms is not well-developed. We focus on a critical, yet often underappreciated, step of the analysis pipeline that of 3D cell segmentation from the acquired tomograms. Aim: We report the CellSNAP (Cell Segmentation via Novel Algorithm for Phase Imaging) algorithm for the 3D segmentation of QPI images. Approach: The cell segmentation algorithm mimics the gemstone extraction process, initiating with a coarse 3D extrusion from a two-dimensional (2D) segmented mask to outline the cell structure. A 2D image is generated, and a segmentation algorithm identifies the boundary in the Results: The CellSNAP algorithm outstrips the current gold standard in terms of speed, robustness, and implementation, achieving cell segmentation under 2 s per cell on a single-core processor. The implementation of CellSNAP can easily be parallelized on a multi-core system for further speed improvements. For the cases where segmentation is possible with the existing standard method, our algorithm displays an average difference of 5% for dry mass and 8% for volume measurements. We also show that CellSNAP can handle challenging image datasets where cells are clumped and marred by interferogram drifts, which pose major difficulties for all QPI-focused AI-based segmentation tools. Conclusion: Our proposed method is less memory intensive and significantly faster than existing methods. The method can be easily implemented on a student laptop. Since the approach is rule-based, there is no need to collect a lot of imaging data and manually annotate them to perform machine learning based training of the model. We envision our work will lead to broader adoption of QPI imaging for high-throughput analysis, which has, in part, been stymied by a lack of suitable image segmentation tools.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalAlgorithmsHumansOptical ImagingQuantitative Phase Imagingcell segmentationimage processingquantitative phase imagingthree-dimensional imaging

Identifiers

PMID38638450
PMCPMC11025678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.