Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38638445›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Phenotypic immune characterization of gastric and esophageal adenocarcinomas reveals profound immune suppression in esophageal tumor locations.

Tessa S Groen-van Schooten, Micaela Harrasser, Jens Seidel, Emma N Bos, Tania Fleitas, Monique van Mourik, Roos E Pouw, Ruben S A Goedegebuure, Benthe H Doeve, Jasper Sanders and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The density of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes in oesophago-gastric cancer varies with disease stage, geographical region and treatment: a post hoc analysis of nine phase III clinical trials.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Tessa S Groen-van Schooten *Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC) location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Micaela Harrasser *Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC) location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jens SeidelDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC) location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Emma N BosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC) location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Tania FleitasMedical Oncology Department, Instituto Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA (INCLIVA), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Monique van MourikDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC) location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Roos E PouwDepartment of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC) location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ruben S A GoedegebuureDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC) location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Benthe H DoeveDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC) location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jasper SandersDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC) location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Joris BosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC) location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Mark I van Berge HenegouwenCancer Biology and Immunology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Victor L J L ThijssenCancer Biology and Immunology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Nicole C T van GriekenCancer Biology and Immunology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Hanneke W M van LaarhovenImaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Tanja D de GruijlDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC) location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Sarah DerksDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC) location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLCancer Center AmsterdamVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLOncode Institute · NLUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tumors in the distal esophagus (EAC), gastro-esophageal junction including cardia (GEJAC), and stomach (GAC) develop in close proximity and show strong similarities on a molecular and cellular level. However, recent clinical data showed that the effectiveness of chemo-immunotherapy is limited to a subset of GEAC patients and that EACs and GEJACs generally benefit less from checkpoint inhibition compared to GACs. As the composition of the tumor immune microenvironment drives response to (immuno)therapy we here performed a detailed immune analysis of a large series of GEACs to facilitate the development of a more individualized immunomodulatory strategy. Methods: Extensive immunophenotyping was performed by 14-color flow cytometry in a prospective study to detail the immune composition of untreated gastro-esophageal cancers (n=104) using fresh tumor biopsies of 35 EACs, 38 GEJACs and 31 GACs. The immune cell composition of GEACs was characterized and correlated with clinicopathologic features such as tumor location, MSI and HER2 status. The spatial immune architecture of a subset of tumors (n=30) was evaluated using multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) which allowed us to determine the tumor infiltration status of CD3+, CD8+, FoxP3+, CD163+ and Ki67+ cells. Results: Immunophenotyping revealed that the tumor immune microenvironment of GEACs is heterogeneous and that immune suppressive cell populations such as monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (mMDSC) are more abundant in EACs compared to GACs (p<0.001). In contrast, GACs indicated a proinflammatory microenvironment with elevated frequencies of proliferating (Ki67+) CD4 Th cells (p<0.001), Ki67+ CD8 T cells (p=0.002), and CD8 effector memory-T cells (p=0.024). Differences between EACs and GACs were confirmed by mIHC analyses showing lower densities of tumor- and stroma-infiltrating Ki67+ CD8 T cells in EAC compared to GAC (both p=0.021). Discussions: This comprehensive immune phenotype study of a large series of untreated GEACs, identified that tumors with an esophageal tumor location have more immune suppressive features compared to tumors in the gastro-esophageal junction or stomach which might explain the location-specific responses to checkpoint inhibitors in this disease. These findings provide an important rationale for stratification according to tumor location in clinical studies and the development of location-dependent immunomodulatory treatment approaches.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionHumansKi-67 AntigenPhenotypeProspective StudiesTumor MicroenvironmentKi-67 AntigenbiomarkersHER2MSIsingle cell flow cytometrytumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID38638445
PMCPMC11024289
OpenAlexW4393946597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.