Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38638369›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Boring systematics: A genome skimmed phylogeny of ctenostome bryozoans and their endolithic family Penetrantiidae with the description of one new species.

Sebastian H Decker, Ahmed J Saadi, Christian Baranyi, Masato Hirose, Sarah Lemer, Andy Sombke, Felipe Aguilera, Leandro M Vieira, Abigail M Smith, Andrea Waeschenbach and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Sebastian H DeckerDepartment of Evolutionary Biology University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9029-8717
Ahmed J SaadiDepartment of Evolutionary Biology University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5113-0441
Christian BaranyiDepartment of Evolutionary Biology University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3118-2145
Masato HiroseSchool of Marine Biosciences Kitasato University Minato-ku Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9991-7238
Sarah LemerMarine Laboratory UOG Station Mangilao Guam USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0048-7296
Andy SombkeCenter for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Cell and Developmental Biology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7383-440X
Felipe AguileraDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas Universidad de Concepción Concepción Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3235-931X
Leandro M VieiraLaboratório de Estudos de Bryozoa-LAEBry, Departamento de Zoologia, Centro de Biociências Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Recife PE Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8661-8861
Abigail M SmithDepartment of Marine Science University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6468-9124
Andrea WaeschenbachDepartment of Life Science Natural History Museum London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8571-9345
Thomas SchwahaDepartment of Evolutionary Biology University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0526-6791
University of Vienna · ATNatural History Museum · GBKitasato Institute Hospital · JPMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Concepción · CLUniversity of Guam · GUUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ctenostomes are a group of gymnolaemate bryozoans with an uncalcified chitinous body wall having few external, skeletal characters. Hence, species identification is challenging and their systematics remain poorly understood, even more so when they exhibit an endolithic (boring) lifestyle. Currently, there are four Recent families of endolithic bryozoans that live inside mineralized substrates like mollusk shells. In particular, Penetrantiidae Silén, 1946 has received considerable attention and its systematic affinity to either cheilostomes or ctenostomes has been debated. Species delimitation of penetrantiids remains difficult, owing to a high degree of colonial and zooidal plasticity. Consequently, an additional molecular approach is essential to unravel the systematics of penetrantiids, their phylogenetic placement and their species diversity. We therefore sequenced the mitochondrial (mt) genomes and two nuclear markers of 27 ctenostome species including nine penetrantiids. Our phylogeny supports the Penetrantiidae as a monophyletic group placed as sister taxon to the remaining ctenostomes alongside paludicellids, arachnidioids and terebriporids. The boring family Terebriporidae d'Orbigny, 1847 were previously considered to be among vesicularioids, but our results suggest an arachnidioid affinity instead. Ctenostome paraphyly is supported by our data, as the cheilostomes nest within them. A Multiporata clade is also well supported, including the former victorelloid genus

Indexed as

crypticmitogenomesMultiporataPenetrantiaskimmingTerebripora

Identifiers

PMID38638369
PMCPMC11024686
OpenAlexW4394926388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.