ArticleInnovation in aging2023
Ca-HELP: Adaptation of a Communication Tool to Help Geriatric Cancer Patients in Rural Settings Talk to Their Doctors About Pain.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual-Gating Strategy: Ultrasound Activation of TRPV2 Channels and Borate-Glass-Induced Calcium Overload for Tumor Suppression.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Improving Pain Self-Management Among Rural Older Adults With Cancer.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Introduction to Special Issue: Translational Research on Pain and Pain Management in Later Life.Innovation in aging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Among the older adult population living in the rural United States, undertreated cancer pain is very common. The need for interventions targeting pain management communication between older adults with cancer in rural communities and their doctors outpaces the current evidence base. Adaptation of existing pain interventions may improve the speed at which clinicians can respond to pain in this vulnerable population. Research Design and Methods: The Cancer Health Empowerment for Living without Pain (Ca-HELP) is an evidence-based communication tool that coaches patients to communicate about pain by asking questions, making requests, and signaling distress to their physicians in order to achieve improved pain control. Guided by the Method for Program Adaptation through Community Engagement (M-PACE) model, which utilizes detailed stakeholder feedback to guide the adaptation of an intervention for an appropriate target audience, we proactively adapted the Ca-HELP and its delivery for use among geriatric cancer patients living in rural settings using qualitative feedback from patients, informal caregivers, and providers as a planned step in a multiphase pilot study. Results: All stakeholders agreed that the Ca-HELP was a promising candidate intervention to improve pain among older adults with cancer. They suggested modifications to the delivery, context, and content of the intervention. A multidisciplinary team of nurse leaders and researchers evaluated stakeholder feedback and recommendations before determining which adaptations were made. Adaptations were cataloged and reported using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced model. Discussion and Implications: Our multistakeholder team proactively modified the Ca-HELP intervention tool using end-user feedback with a goal to optimize fit for use by older adults with cancer in rural settings without compromising the active ingredients. Documenting and reporting modifications to interventions are critical to their implementation and will lay the groundwork for further testing of the efficacy of the adapted Ca-HELP intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.