ArticleBioinformatics advances2024
CATD: a reproducible pipeline for selecting cell-type deconvolution methods across tissues.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A data-driven framework reconstructs the molecular continuum of human MASLD progression.Nature metabolism · 2026Article
- A guide to transcriptomic deconvolution in cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Review
- omnideconv: a unifying framework for using and benchmarking single-cell-informed deconvolution of bulk RNA-seq data.Genome biology · 2026Article
- IPGCA: A Comprehensive Single Cell Atlas of 1 074 127 Porcine Intestinal Cells Revealing Cellular Dynamics, Genetic Regulation, and Cross-Species Conservation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Impact of Cattle Breed in scRNA-Seq Reference on Muscle Fiber Type Deconvolution from Bulk RNA-Seq: A Comparison of Software Tools.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025Article
- Approaching the holistic transcriptome-convolution and deconvolution in transcriptomics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Deconer: An Evaluation Toolkit for Reference-based Deconvolution Methods Using Gene Expression Data.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Alleviating batch effects in cell type deconvolution with SCCAF-D.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Expression Atlas update: insights from sequencing data at both bulk and single cell level.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Cell-type deconvolution methods aim to infer cell composition from bulk transcriptomic data. The proliferation of developed methods coupled with inconsistent results obtained in many cases, highlights the pressing need for guidance in the selection of appropriate methods. Additionally, the growing accessibility of single-cell RNA sequencing datasets, often accompanied by bulk expression from related samples enable the benchmark of existing methods. Results: In this study, we conduct a comprehensive assessment of 31 methods, utilizing single-cell RNA-sequencing data from diverse human and mouse tissues. Employing various simulation scenarios, we reveal the efficacy of regression-based deconvolution methods, highlighting their sensitivity to reference choices. We investigate the impact of bulk-reference differences, incorporating variables such as sample, study and technology. We provide validation using a gold standard dataset from mononuclear cells and suggest a consensus prediction of proportions when ground truth is not available. We validated the consensus method on data from the stomach and studied its spillover effect. Importantly, we propose the use of the critical assessment of transcriptomic deconvolution (CATD) pipeline which encompasses functionalities for generating references and pseudo-bulks and running implemented deconvolution methods. CATD streamlines simultaneous deconvolution of numerous bulk samples, providing a practical solution for speeding up the evaluation of newly developed methods. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/Papatheodorou-Group/CATD_snakemake.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.