Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38638272›Full record

ArticlePsychologica Belgica2024

Adieu Bias: Debiasing Intuitions Among French Speakers.

Nina Franiatte, Esther Boissin, Alexandra Delmas, Wim De Neys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychologica Belgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nina FraniatteUniversitéParis Cité, LaPsyDÉ, CNRS, 46 rue Saint Jacques, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2246-1726
Esther BoissinUniversitéParis Cité, LaPsyDÉ, CNRS, 46 rue Saint Jacques, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6485-7466
Alexandra DelmasResearch and Development Team, Onepoint, 2 rue Marc Sangnier, 33110 Bègles, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0344-0076
Wim De NeysUniversitéParis Cité, LaPsyDÉ, CNRS, 46 rue Saint Jacques, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0917-8852

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent debiasing studies have shown that a short, plain-English explanation of the correct solution strategy can improve reasoning performance. However, these studies have predominantly focused on English-speaking populations, who were tested with problem contents designed for an English-speaking test environment. Here we explore whether the key findings of previous debiasing studies can be extended to native French speakers living in continental Europe (France). We ran a training session with a battery of three reasoning tasks (i.e., base-rate neglect, conjunction fallacy, and bat-and-ball) on 147 native French speakers. We used a two-response paradigm in which participants first gave an initial intuitive response, under time pressure and cognitive load, and then gave a final response after deliberation. Results showed a clear training effect, as early as the initial (intuitive) stage. Immediately after training, most participants solved the problems correctly, without the need for a deliberation process. The findings confirm that the intuitive debiasing training effect extends to native French speakers.

Indexed as

DebiasingFrenchHeuristics and biasesIntuitionReasoning

Identifiers

PMID38638272
PMCPMC11025568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.