ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2024
Neuroprotective effects of acteoside in a glaucoma mouse model by targeting Serta domain-containing protein 4.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anti-neuroinflammatory and neuroprotective effects of acteoside (verbascoside) in experimental models of neurodegeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- UGP2 is a potential target for breast cancer, based on bioinformatics analysis and in vitro experiments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring SERTAD4 as a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in breast cancer: insights from multidatabase analyses and in vitro studies.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- A review of the 661W cell line as a tool to facilitate treatment development for retinal diseases.Cell & bioscience · 2025Review
- Exploring the Ocular Surface Microbiome and Tear Proteome in Glaucoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo explore the therapeutic effect and main molecular mechanisms of acteoside in a glaucoma model in DBA/2J mice.
methodsProteomics was used to compare the differentially expressed proteins of C57 and DBA/2J mice. After acteoside administration in DBA/2J mice, anterior segment observation, intraocular pressure (IOP) monitoring, electrophysiology examination, and hematoxylin and eosin staining were used to analyze any potential effects. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays were used to verify the proteomics results. Furthermore, retinal ganglion cell 5 (RGC5) cell proliferation was assessed with cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assays. Serta domain-containing protein 4 (Sertad4) mRNA and protein expression levels were measured by qRT-PCR and Western blot analysis, respectively.
resultsProteomics analysis suggested that Sertad4 was the most significantly differentially expressed protein. Compared with the saline group, the acteoside treatment group showed decreased IOP, improved N1-P1 wave amplitudes, thicker retina, and larger numbers of cells in the ganglion cell layer (GCL). The IHC results showed that Sertad4 expression levels in DBA/2J mice treated with acteoside were significantly lower than in the saline group. Acteoside treatment could improve RGC5 cell survival and reduce the Sertad4 mRNA and protein expression levels after glutamate injury.
conclusionSertad4 is differentially expressed in DBA/2J mice. Acteoside can protect RGCs from damage, possibly through the downregulation of Sertad4, and has a potential use in glaucoma treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.