ArticleAPL bioengineering2024
Mechanism study on the influences of buffer osmotic pressure on microfluidic chip-based cell electrofusion.
Article in APL bioengineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dendritic cell vaccines: Current research progress, challenges, and opportunities.Genes & diseases · 2026Review
- Hydrodynamic efficient cell capture and pairing method on microfluidic cell electrofusion chip.APL bioengineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell electrofusion is a key process in many research fields, such as genetics, immunology, and cross-breeding. The electrofusion efficiency is highly dependent on the buffer osmotic pressure properties. However, the mechanism by which the buffer osmotic pressure affects cell electrofusion has not been theoretically or numerically understood. In order to explore the mechanism, the microfluidic structure with paired arc micro-cavities was first evaluated based on the numerical analysis of the transmembrane potential and the electroporation induced on biological cells when the electrofusion was performed on this structure. Then, the numerical model was used to analyze the effect of three buffer osmotic pressures on the on-chip electrofusion in terms of membrane tension and cell size. Compared to hypertonic and isotonic buffers, hypotonic buffer not only increased the reversible electroporation area in the cell-cell contact zone by 1.7 times by inducing a higher membrane tension, but also significantly reduced the applied voltage required for cell electroporation by increasing the cell size. Finally, the microfluidic chip with arc micro-cavities was fabricated and tested for electrofusion of SP2/0 cells. The results showed that no cell fusion occurred in the hypertonic buffer. The fusion efficiency in the isotonic buffer was about 7%. In the hypotonic buffer, the fusion efficiency was about 60%, which was significantly higher compared to hypertonic and isotonic buffers. The experimental results were in good agreement with the numerical analysis results.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.