Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38638144›Full record

ArticleAPL bioengineering2024

Mechanism study on the influences of buffer osmotic pressure on microfluidic chip-based cell electrofusion.

Mengli Xu, Xiaoling Zhang, Yaqi Bai, Xuefeng Wang, Jun Yang, Ning Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in APL bioengineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mengli XuKey Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology, Ministry of Education and Bioengineering College, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.
Xiaoling ZhangSchool of Smart Health, Chongqing College of Electronic Engineering, Chongqing 401331, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7412-2540
Yaqi BaiKey Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology, Ministry of Education and Bioengineering College, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5042-9840
Xuefeng WangKey Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology, Ministry of Education and Bioengineering College, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.
Jun YangKey Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology, Ministry of Education and Bioengineering College, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6877-8677
Ning HuKey Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology, Ministry of Education and Bioengineering College, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6902-3302

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell electrofusion is a key process in many research fields, such as genetics, immunology, and cross-breeding. The electrofusion efficiency is highly dependent on the buffer osmotic pressure properties. However, the mechanism by which the buffer osmotic pressure affects cell electrofusion has not been theoretically or numerically understood. In order to explore the mechanism, the microfluidic structure with paired arc micro-cavities was first evaluated based on the numerical analysis of the transmembrane potential and the electroporation induced on biological cells when the electrofusion was performed on this structure. Then, the numerical model was used to analyze the effect of three buffer osmotic pressures on the on-chip electrofusion in terms of membrane tension and cell size. Compared to hypertonic and isotonic buffers, hypotonic buffer not only increased the reversible electroporation area in the cell-cell contact zone by 1.7 times by inducing a higher membrane tension, but also significantly reduced the applied voltage required for cell electroporation by increasing the cell size. Finally, the microfluidic chip with arc micro-cavities was fabricated and tested for electrofusion of SP2/0 cells. The results showed that no cell fusion occurred in the hypertonic buffer. The fusion efficiency in the isotonic buffer was about 7%. In the hypotonic buffer, the fusion efficiency was about 60%, which was significantly higher compared to hypertonic and isotonic buffers. The experimental results were in good agreement with the numerical analysis results.

Identifiers

PMID38638144
PMCPMC11026109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.