Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38637959›Full record

ReviewESC heart failure2024

Predicting in-hospital mortality among patients admitted with a diagnosis of heart failure: a machine learning approach.

Zina Jawadi, Rosemary He, Pratyaksh K Srivastava, Gregg C Fonarow, Suzan O Khalil, Srikanth Krishnan, Eleazar Eskin, Jeffrey N Chiang, Ali Nsair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESC heart failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zina JawadiUCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9439-7533
Rosemary HeDepartment of Computer Science, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Pratyaksh K SrivastavaAhmanson-UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center, Ronald Reagan-UCLA Medical Center, MRL 3-760, 675 C.E. Young Dr., Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1760, USA.
Gregg C FonarowAhmanson-UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center, Ronald Reagan-UCLA Medical Center, MRL 3-760, 675 C.E. Young Dr., Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1760, USA.
Suzan O KhalilAhmanson-UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center, Ronald Reagan-UCLA Medical Center, MRL 3-760, 675 C.E. Young Dr., Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1760, USA.
Srikanth KrishnanDivision of Cardiology, Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Eleazar EskinDepartment of Computer Science, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jeffrey N ChiangDepartment of Computational Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ali NsairAhmanson-UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center, Ronald Reagan-UCLA Medical Center, MRL 3-760, 675 C.E. Young Dr., Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1760, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing risk prediction models for hospitalized heart failure patients are limited. We identified patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of heart failure between 7 May 2013 and 26 April 2022 from a large academic, quaternary care medical centre (training cohort). Demographics, medical comorbidities, vitals, and labs were collected and were used to construct random forest machine learning models to predict in-hospital mortality. Models were compared with logistic regression, and to commonly used heart failure risk scores. The models were subsequently validated in patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of heart failure from a second academic, community medical centre (validation cohort). The entire cohort comprised 21 802 patients, of which 14 539 were in the training cohort and 7263 were in the validation cohort. The median age (25th-75th percentile) was 70 (58-82) for the entire cohort, 43.2% were female, and 6.7% experienced inpatient mortality. In the overall cohort, 7621 (35.0%) patients had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (EF ≤ 40%), 1271 (5.8%) had heart failure with mildly reduced EF (EF 41-49%), and 12 910 (59.2%) had heart failure with preserved EF (EF ≥ 50%). Random forest models in the validation cohort demonstrated a c-statistic (95% confidence interval) of 0.96 (0.95-0.97), sensitivity (SN) of 87.3%, and specificity (SP) of 90.6% for the prediction of in-hospital mortality. Models for those with HFrEF demonstrated a c-statistic of 0.96 (0.94-0.98), SN 88.2%, and SP 91.0%, and those for patients with HFpEF showed a c-statistic of 0.95 (0.93-0.97), SN 87.4%, and SP 89.5% for predicting in-hospital mortality. The random forest model significantly outperformed logistic regression (c-statistic 0.87, SN 75.9%, and SP 86.9%), and current existing risk scores including the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry risk score (c-statistic of 0.70, SN 69%, and SP 62%), and the Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure risk score (c-statistic 0.69, SN 67%, and SP 63%); P < 0.001 for comparison. Machine learning models built from commonly recorded patient information can accurately predict in-hospital mortality among patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of heart failure.

Indexed as

Heart FailureHospital MortalityMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStroke VolumeSurvival RateHeart failureMachine learningRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID38637959
PMCPMC11424320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.