ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Clinical impact of whole-body MRI in staging and surveillance of patients with myxoid liposarcoma: a 14-year single-centre retrospective study.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of metastasis in myxoid liposarcoma: WB-MRI versus CT-CAP.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the clinical impact of regular whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) surveillance in myxoid liposarcoma patients.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of myxoid liposarcoma patients who underwent at least one WBMRI at our institution between October 2006 and December 2020. The effect of WBMRI on clinical management, namely treatment modification or additional diagnostic investigations was studied. A standardised WBMRI surveillance protocol was instituted in 2015. We compared patient outcomes for the metastatic patients who had and had not received regular WBMRI surveillance and performed survival analysis for both subgroups.
resultsOf the 56 patients (60.7% male, median age: 48.1 years) who underwent 345 WBMRI, 17 (30.3%) had metastases, and 168 WBMRI were performed in this group. The median imaging follow-up for the entire cohort was 35 months; the metastatic group had a median follow-up of 42 months. WBMRI changed the clinical management in 13 (76.5%) metastatic patients, with 33 instances of treatment modification. Thirty-five lesions were labelled 'indeterminate,' 16 (45.7%) had additional investigations/interventions, and 4 (11.4%) were confirmed to be metastatic. Twenty-one metastatic lesions were missed initially on WBMRI and confirmed on subsequent WBMRI, of which 5 (23.8%) were clinically significant. The 5-year survival since the detection of metastasis was better in the regular surveillance subgroup (85.7% vs. 45%), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.068). Five patients (8.9%) developed their first metastasis more than 5 years after diagnosing the primary lesion.
conclusionRegular WBMRI surveillance of myxoid liposarcoma patients considerably impacts clinical management by frequently influencing treatment decisions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: WBMRI has been recently recommended as an imaging option for the staging and surveillance of myxoid liposarcoma patients. Our study highlights the impact of regular WBMRI surveillance on the clinical management of these patients and how it affects their survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.