Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38637348›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2024

Where scrollbars are clicked, and why.

Oliver Herbort, Philipp Raßbach, Wilfried Kunde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oliver HerbortDepartment of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, 97070, Würzburg, Germany. oliver.herbort@uni-wuerzburg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8455-5614
Philipp RaßbachDepartment of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4305-3850
Wilfried KundeDepartment of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6256-8011

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft HE6710/2-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scrolling is a widely used mean to interact with visual displays, usually to move content to a certain target location on the display. Understanding how user scroll might identify potentially suboptimal use and allows to infer users' intentions. In the present study, we examined where users click on a scrollbar depending on the intended scrolling action. In two online experiments, click positions were systematically adapted to the intended scrolling action. Click position selection could not be explained as strict optimization of the distance traveled with the cursor, memory load, or motor-cognitive factors. By contrast, for identical scrolling actions click positions strongly depended on the context and on previous scrolls. The behavior of our participants closely resembled behavior observed for manipulation of other physical devices and suggested a simple heuristic of movement planning. The results have implications for modeling human-computer interaction and may contribute to predicting user behavior.

Indexed as

IntentionMovementHumansAction planningAnticipationHuman–computer interactionScrolling

Identifiers

PMID38637348
PMCPMC11026321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.