Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38637330›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2024

Population-average mediation analysis for zero-inflated count outcomes.

Andrew Sims, D Leann Long, Hemant K Tiwari, Jinhong Cui, Dustin M Long, Todd M Brown, Melissa J Smith, Emily B Levitan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew SimsDepartment of Biostatistics, Ryals Public Health Building (RPHB), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8525-4381
D Leann LongDepartment of Biostatistics, Ryals Public Health Building (RPHB), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Hemant K TiwariDepartment of Biostatistics, Ryals Public Health Building (RPHB), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Jinhong CuiDepartment of Biostatistics, Ryals Public Health Building (RPHB), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Dustin M LongDepartment of Biostatistics, Ryals Public Health Building (RPHB), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Todd M BrownDepartment of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Melissa J SmithDepartment of Biostatistics, Ryals Public Health Building (RPHB), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Emily B LevitanDepartment of Epidemiology, Ryals Public Health Building (RPHB), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

Funding

VCID and Stroke in a Bi-racial National CohortU01NS041588 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CUSHMAN, MARY, HOWARD, GEORGE · 2002 to 2022
$96.0M
UAB Cardiovascular Disease Predoctoral Training Program in Biostatistics and EpidemiologyT32HL155007 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI IRVIN, MARGUERITE R, TIWARI, HEMANT K. · 2021 to 2025
$794k
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL155007NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS041588
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mediation analysis is an increasingly popular statistical method for explaining causal pathways to inform intervention. While methods have increased, there is still a dearth of robust mediation methods for count outcomes with excess zeroes. Current mediation methods addressing this issue are computationally intensive, biased, or challenging to interpret. To overcome these limitations, we propose a new mediation methodology for zero-inflated count outcomes using the marginalized zero-inflated Poisson (MZIP) model and the counterfactual approach to mediation. This novel work gives population-average mediation effects whose variance can be estimated rapidly via delta method. This methodology is extended to cases with exposure-mediator interactions. We apply this novel methodology to explore if diabetes diagnosis can explain BMI differences in healthcare utilization and test model performance via simulations comparing the proposed MZIP method to existing zero-inflated and Poisson methods. We find that our proposed method minimizes bias and computation time compared to alternative approaches while allowing for straight-forward interpretations.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationMediation AnalysisBiasBody Mass IndexCausalityDiabetes MellitusHumansModels, StatisticalPoisson Distributionexcess zeroesmediation analysisPoissonzero‐inflated counts

Identifiers

PMID38637330
PMCPMC11472297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.