Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38637283›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pediatric psychology2024

Teaching children pedestrian safety in virtual reality via smartphone: a noninferiority randomized clinical trial.

David C Schwebel, Anna Johnston, Dominique McDaniel, Joan Severson, Yefei He, Leslie A McClure

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David C SchwebelDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2141-8970
Anna JohnstonDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Dominique McDanielDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Joan SeversonDigital Artefacts, LLC, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Yefei HeDigital Artefacts, LLC, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Leslie A McClureDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Funding

Virtual Reality by Mobile Phone: Improving Child Pedestrian SafetyR01HD088415 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SCHWEBEL, DAVID C · 2016 to 2021
$2.8M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human DevelopmentNICHD NIH HHS R01 HD088415NIH HHSNIH HHS NCT02948400NIH HHS R01HD088415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate whether child pedestrian safety training in a smartphone-based virtual reality (VR) environment is not inferior to training in a large, semi-immersive VR environment with demonstrated effectiveness.

methodsFive hundred 7- and 8-year-old children participated; 479 were randomized to one of two conditions: Learning to cross streets in a smartphone-based VR or learning in a semi-immersive kiosk VR. The systems used identical virtual environments and scenarios. At baseline, children's pedestrian skills were assessed in both VR systems and through a vehicle approach estimation task (judging speed/distance of oncoming traffic on monitor). Training in both conditions comprised at least six 30-min sessions in the randomly assigned VR platform and continued for up to 25 visits until adult-level proficiency was obtained. Following training and again 6 months later, children completed pedestrian safety assessments identical to baseline. Three outcomes were considered from assessments in each VR platform: Unsafe crossings (collisions plus close calls), time to contact (shortest time between child and oncoming simulated traffic), and missed opportunities (unselected safe opportunities to cross).

resultsParticipants achieved adult-level street-crossing skill through VR training. Training in a smartphone-based VR system was generally not inferior to training in a large semi-immersive VR system. There were no adverse effects.

conclusionsSeven- and 8-year-old children can learn pedestrian safety through VR-based training, including training in a smartphone-based VR system. Combined with recent meta-analytic results, the present findings support broad implementation and dissemination of child pedestrian safety training through VR, including smartphone-based VR systems.

Indexed as

PedestriansSafetySmartphoneVirtual RealityAccidents, TrafficChildFemaleHumansMaleWalkingchild safetyinterventionpedestrian injurytrainingvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID38637283
PMCPMC11175590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.