ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2024
Brain Arteriovenous Malformation In Vitro Model for Transvenous Embolization Using 3D Printing and Real Patient Data.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanistically driven transnidal hemodynamic manipulations enhance simulated endovascular transvenous treatments for brain AVMs.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Design, manufacturing, and multi-modal imaging of stereolithography 3D printed flexible intracranial aneurysm phantoms.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeTransvenous embolization has emerged as a novel technique for treating selected brain AVMs with high reported occlusion rates. However, it requires anatomic and technical skills to be successful and to ensure patient safety. Therefore, training and testing are essential for preparing clinicians to perform these procedures. Our aim was to develop and test a novel, patient-specific brain AVM in vitro model for transvenous embolization by using 3D printing technology. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe developed a brain AVM in vitro model based on real patient data by using stereolithography resin 3D printing. We created a closed pulsed circuit with flow passing from the arterial side to the venous side, and we tested the effect of mean arterial pressure on retrograde nidal filling with contrast injections. Transvenous embolization simulations were conducted for each of the 12 identical models divided into 2 groups (2×6). This involved the use of an ethylene-vinyl alcohol liquid embolic agent injected through microcatheters either without or with a coil in the vein (groups 1 and 2, respectively).
resultsRetrograde contrast advance to nidus was directly related to lower mean arterial pressure. Transvenous embolization tests with a liquid embolic agent adequately reproduced the usual embolization plug and push technique. We found no differences between the 2 group conditions, and additional venous coil neither increased nidus penetration nor reduced injection time in the model (57.6 versus 61.2% nidus occlusion rate, respectively).
conclusionsWe were able to develop and test a functional in vitro brain AVM model for transvenous embolization by using 3D printing to emulate its conditions and characteristics. Better contrast penetration was achieved with less mean arterial pressure, and no embolization advantage was found by adding coil to the vein in this model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.