Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38636529›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Global health2024

Facilitating the development of urgently required combination vaccines.

William P Hausdorff, Shabir A Madhi, Gagandeep Kang, Lassané Kaboré, Marta Tufet Bayona, Birgitte K Giersing

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Global vaccine development.Nature medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Development of an 8-valentFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

William P HausdorffCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Washington, DC, USA; Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: whausdorff@path.org.
Shabir A MadhiSouth African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytics Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Gagandeep KangBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lassané KaboréPATH, Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, Dakar, Senegal; Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marta Tufet BayonaGavi, The Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland.
Birgitte K GiersingWHO Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The essence of a vaccine lies in its ability to elicit a set of immune responses specifically directed at a particular pathogen. Accordingly, vaccines were historically designed, developed, registered, recommended, procured, and administered as monopathogen formulations. Nonetheless, the control and elimination of an astonishing number of diseases was realised only after several once-separate vaccines were provided as combinations. Unfortunately, the current superabundance of recommended and pipeline vaccines is now at odds with the number of acceptable vaccine administrations and feasible health-care visits for vaccine recipients and health-care providers. Yet, few new combinations are in development because, in addition to the scientific and manufacturing hurdles intrinsic to coformulation, developers face a gauntlet of regulatory, policy, and commercialisation obstacles in a milieu still largely designed for monopathogen vaccines. We argue here that national policy makers and public health agencies should prospectively identify and advocate for the development of new multipathogen combination vaccines, and suggest ways to accelerate the regulatory pathways to licensure of combinations and other concrete, innovative steps to mitigate current obstacles.

Indexed as

Vaccines, CombinedHealth PolicyHumansVaccine DevelopmentVaccines, Combined

Identifiers

PMID38636529
PMCPMC11099297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.