ArticleNeuroepidemiology2024
Cerebral Palsy Heterogeneity: Clinical Characteristics and Diagnostic Significance from a Large-Sample Analysis.
Article in Neuroepidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- MRI patterns and clinical outcomes in cerebral palsy: insights from a large MRICS-based cohort.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2025Article
- Efficacy of Virtual Reality Interventions for Motor Function Improvement in Cerebral Palsy Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Time and Mind: A State-of-the-Art Perspective on Time Perception and Cognitive-Motor Interactions in Children and Adolescents with Cerebral Palsy.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Pilot Investigation on the Relationship Between Infant Vocal Characteristics at 12 Months and Speech Motor Impairment at 4-5 Years.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting intellectual disability in children with cerebral palsy.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCerebral palsy (CP) is a nonprogressive movement disorder resulting from a prenatal or perinatal brain injury that benefits from early diagnosis and intervention. The timing of early CP diagnosis remains controversial, necessitating analysis of clinical features in a substantial cohort.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed medical records from a university hospital, focusing on children aged ≥24 months or followed up for ≥24 months and adhering to the International Classification of Diseases-10 for diagnosis and subtyping.
resultsAmong the 2012 confirmed CP cases, 68.84% were male and 51.44% had spastic diplegia. Based on the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), 62.38% were in levels I and II and 19.88% were in levels IV and V. Hemiplegic and diplegic subtypes predominantly fell into levels I and II, while quadriplegic and mixed types were mainly levels IV and V. White matter injuries appeared in 46.58% of cranial MRI findings, while maldevelopment was rare (7.05%). Intellectual disability co-occurred in 43.44% of the CP cases, with hemiplegia having the lowest co-occurrence (20.28%, 58/286) and mixed types having the highest co-occurrence (73.85%, 48/65). Additionally, 51.67% (697/1,349) of the children with CP aged ≥48 months had comorbidities.
conclusionsThis study underscores white matter injury as the primary CP pathology and identifies intellectual disability as a common comorbidity. Although CP can be identified in infants under 1 year old, precision in diagnosis improves with development. These insights inform early detection and tailored interventions, emphasizing their crucial role in CP management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.