ArticleGerontology2024
Health Promotion Models for Improving Footcare in Older Adults: A Scoping Review.
Article in Gerontology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Community support group intervention to promote self-management of non-communicable disease in Nepal: A pilot study.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- eHealth Literacy Interventions: Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFootcare is an important component of wellbeing in older adults and the promotion of appropriate footcare interventions is imperative for health professionals working with this population. In this scoping review, we describe the health promotion models informing footcare interventions for older adults. The objectives were to (i) understand the context(s) where health promotion models have informed footcare interventions; (ii) identify the health promotion models informing interventions; and (iii) document the effectiveness of theoretically informed health promotion interventions for improving footcare in older adults.
methodsFootcare interventions developed using health promotion models worldwide and published in English before July 2023 were searched using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar.
resultsA total of 2,078 articles were identified, of which 31 were retrieved and assessed for eligibility. Eight articles met the eligibility criteria, with most interventions delivered in Asia (n = 5) and using self-efficacy theory as their theoretical framework (n = 6). Most of the studies included people with diabetes (n = 6) and outcomes were measured using foot health outcomes, knowledge of foot health, and footcare behaviors and self-efficacy.
conclusionThis scoping review has identified a range of footcare interventions, with evidence of promising outcomes on improving footcare in older adults. Approaches toward methods and dosage of intervention varied across the studies and more broadly, we identified that few studies report the health promotion model informing the design of intervention(s). Further research is required to ascertain which health promotion model, modality of promotion, and implementation approach are the most effective for improving footcare in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.