ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2024
Methodology for Using Real-World Data From Electronic Health Records to Assess Chemotherapy Administration in Women With Breast Cancer.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinician- and facility-level factors associated with chemotherapy dose reductions in stages I-IIIA breast cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Automated extraction of fluoropyrimidine treatment and treatment-related toxicities from clinical notes using natural language processing.International journal of medical informatics · 2026Article
- The landscape of chemotherapy modifications among women treated for stage I-IIIA breast cancer.Cancer · 2026Article
- Evaluation of methods to identify chemotherapy-related hematologic toxicities in real-world settings.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Initial chemotherapy dose reductions and subsequent treatment delivery in stage I-IIIA breast cancer.Cancer · 2026Article
- Associations between age and chemotherapy dose reductions in women with stage I-IIIA breast cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Clinician- and Facility-Level Factors Associated With Receipt of Nonguideline Chemotherapy Regimens in Women With Stage I-IIIA Breast Cancer.JCO oncology practice · 2025Article
- Understanding the association between body mass index and chemotherapy dose reductions in women treated for stage I-IIIA breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Patient factors and modifications to intended chemotherapy for women with Stages I-IIIA breast cancer.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Patient characteristics associated with conventional schedule vs. dose dense chemotherapy in women with stage I-IIIA breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Methodologic Approach to Defining Comorbidities in a Cohort of Patients With Cancer: An Example in the Optimal Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Dosing Study.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Article
- The landscape of use of NCCN-guideline chemotherapy regimens in stage I-IIIA breast cancer in an integrated healthcare delivery system.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Patient Characteristics Associated with Intended Nonguideline Chemotherapy in Women with Stage I to IIIA Breast Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIdentification of patients' intended chemotherapy regimens is critical to most research questions conducted in the real-world setting of cancer care. Yet, these data are not routinely available in electronic health records (EHRs) at the specificity required to address these questions. We developed a methodology to identify patients' intended regimens from EHR data in the Optimal Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Dosing (OBCD) study.
methodsIn women older than 18 years, diagnosed with primary stage I-IIIA breast cancer at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (2006-2019), we categorized participants into 24 drug combinations described in National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for breast cancer treatment. Participants were categorized into 50 guideline chemotherapy administration schedules within these combinations using an iterative algorithm process, followed by chart abstraction where necessary. We also identified patients intended to receive nonguideline administration schedules within guideline drug combinations and nonguideline drug combinations. This process was adapted at Kaiser Permanente Washington using abstracted data (2004-2015).
resultsIn the OBCD cohort, 13,231 women received adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, of whom 10,213 (77%) had their intended regimen identified via the algorithm, 2,416 (18%) had their intended regimen identified via abstraction, and 602 (4.5%) could not be identified. Across guideline drug combinations, 111 nonguideline dosing schedules were used, alongside 61 nonguideline drug combinations. A number of factors were associated with requiring abstraction for regimen determination, including: decreasing neighborhood household income, earlier diagnosis year, later stage, nodal status, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)+ status.
conclusionWe describe the challenges and approaches to operationalize complex, real-world data to identify intended chemotherapy regimens in large, observational studies. This methodology can improve efficiency of use of large-scale clinical data in real-world populations, helping answer critical questions to improve care delivery and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.