Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38635936›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2024

Methodology for Using Real-World Data From Electronic Health Records to Assess Chemotherapy Administration in Women With Breast Cancer.

Jenna Bhimani, Kelli O'Connell, Isaac J Ergas, Marilyn Foley, Grace B Gallagher, Jennifer J Griggs, Narre Heon, Tatjana Kolevska, Yuriy Kotsurovskyy, Candyce H Kroenke and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Patient Characteristics Associated with Intended Nonguideline Chemotherapy in Women with Stage I to IIIA Breast Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jenna BhimaniDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-9962-7019
Kelli O'ConnellDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-4021-0788
Isaac J ErgasDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-3187-9754
Marilyn FoleyDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.
Grace B GallagherDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0009-0004-9277-5002
Jennifer J GriggsDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology and Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-1598-4562
Narre HeonDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0009-0003-5239-0821
Tatjana KolevskaDepartment of Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Vallejo, CA.
Yuriy KotsurovskyyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Candyce H KroenkeDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-6128-3118
Cecile A LaurentDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-9332-6971
Raymond LiuDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-4667-9632
Kanichi G NakataKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0001-6730-6045
Sonia PersaudDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0009-0008-5666-7994
Donna R RiveraDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-4565-4556
Janise M RohDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-8615-4320
Sara TabatabaiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-5498-7176
Emily ValiceDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-2408-9727
Erin J A BowlesKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0001-6287-7391
Elisa V BanderaCancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.ORCID 0000-0002-8789-2755
Lawrence H KushiDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-9136-1175
Elizabeth D KantorDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-9124-5323
Kaiser Permanente · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USKaiser Permanente Vallejo Medical Center · USNational Cancer Institute · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Infrastructure for Pathways, a Prospective Study of Breast Cancer SurvivorshipU01CA195565 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI AMBROSONE, CHRISTINE B., KUSHI, LAWRENCE H · 2016 to 2025
$18.8M
CRN4: Cancer Research Resources & Collaboration in Integrated Health Care SystemsU24CA171524 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KUSHI, LAWRENCE H · 2012 to 2016
$16.0M
Obesity, chemotherapy dosing, and breast cancer outcomesR37CA222793 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI KANTOR, ELIZABETH DAVID · 2018 to 2024
$4.0M
An Electronic Health Record-Based Tool to Identify Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients at Risk of Low Social SupportR01CA253028 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KROENKE, CANDYCE H · 2020 to 2025
$2.6M
Group Health Cancer Research Program Research Specialist AwardR50CA211115 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BOWLES, ERIN JANELLE AIELLO · 2017 to 2021
$919k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA253028NCI NIH HHS R37 CA222793NCI NIH HHS R50 CA211115NCI NIH HHS U01 CA195565NCI NIH HHS U24 CA171524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIdentification of patients' intended chemotherapy regimens is critical to most research questions conducted in the real-world setting of cancer care. Yet, these data are not routinely available in electronic health records (EHRs) at the specificity required to address these questions. We developed a methodology to identify patients' intended regimens from EHR data in the Optimal Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Dosing (OBCD) study.

methodsIn women older than 18 years, diagnosed with primary stage I-IIIA breast cancer at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (2006-2019), we categorized participants into 24 drug combinations described in National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for breast cancer treatment. Participants were categorized into 50 guideline chemotherapy administration schedules within these combinations using an iterative algorithm process, followed by chart abstraction where necessary. We also identified patients intended to receive nonguideline administration schedules within guideline drug combinations and nonguideline drug combinations. This process was adapted at Kaiser Permanente Washington using abstracted data (2004-2015).

resultsIn the OBCD cohort, 13,231 women received adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, of whom 10,213 (77%) had their intended regimen identified via the algorithm, 2,416 (18%) had their intended regimen identified via abstraction, and 602 (4.5%) could not be identified. Across guideline drug combinations, 111 nonguideline dosing schedules were used, alongside 61 nonguideline drug combinations. A number of factors were associated with requiring abstraction for regimen determination, including: decreasing neighborhood household income, earlier diagnosis year, later stage, nodal status, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)+ status.

conclusionWe describe the challenges and approaches to operationalize complex, real-world data to identify intended chemotherapy regimens in large, observational studies. This methodology can improve efficiency of use of large-scale clinical data in real-world populations, helping answer critical questions to improve care delivery and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDrug CombinationsElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansDrug Combinations

Identifiers

PMID38635936
PMCPMC11902409
OpenAlexW4394936128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.