ArticlePloS one2024
Validation of Trypanosoma cruzi inactivation techniques for laboratory use.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi) is the causative agent of Chagas' disease, a parasitic infection responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in Latin America. The current treatments have many serious drawbacks and new drugs are urgently required. In the UK, T. cruzi is classified by the Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) as a Hazard Group 3 organism and strict safety practices must be adhered to when handling this pathogen in the laboratory. Validated inactivation techniques are required for safe T. cruzi waste disposal and removal from Containment Level 3 (CL3) facilities for storage, transportation and experimental analysis. Here we assess three T. cruzi. inactivation methods. These include three freeze-thaw cycles, chemical inactivation with Virkon disinfectant, and air drying on Whatman FTA cards (A, B, C, Elute) and on a Mitra microsampling device. After each treatment parasite growth was monitored for 4-6 weeks by microscopic examination. Three freeze-thaw cycles were sufficient to inactivate all T. cruzi CLBrener Luc life cycle stages and Silvio x10/7 A1 large epimastigote cell pellets up to two grams wet weight. Virkon treatment for one hour inactivated T. cruzi Silvio x10/7 subclone A1 and CLBrener Luc both in whole blood and cell culture medium when incubated at a final concentration of 2.5% Virkon, or at ≥1% Virkon when in tenfold excess of sample volume. Air drying also inactivated T. cruzi CLBrener Luc spiked blood when dried on FTA A, B or Elute cards for ≥30 minutes and on a Mitra Microsampler for two hours. However, T. cruzi CLBrener Luc were not inactivated on FTA C cards when dried for up to two hours. These experimentally confirmed conditions provide three validated T. cruzi inactivation methods which can be applied to other related ACDP Hazard Group 2-3 kinetoplastid parasites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.