Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38635681›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Comparison of quality and interpretation of newborn ultrasound screening examinations for developmental dysplasia of the hip by basically trained nurses and junior physicians with no previous ultrasound experience.

Munkhtulga Ulziibat, Bayalag Munkhuu, Raoul Schmid, Corinne Wyder, Thomas Baumann, Stefan Essig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Munkhtulga UlziibatDepartment of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6549-9082
Bayalag MunkhuuNational Center for Maternal and Child Health, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Raoul SchmidBaarer Kinderarzt Praxis, Baar, Switzerland.
Corinne WyderKinderärzte KurWerk, Burgdorf, Switzerland.
Thomas BaumannCenter of Primary and Community Care, Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Stefan EssigCenter of Primary and Community Care, Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3228-7010
University of Lucerne · CHAmt für Gemeinden und Raumordnung · CHNational Center for Communicable Diseases · MN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe are obliged to give babies the chance to profit from a nationwide screening of developmental dysplasia of the hip in very rural areas of Mongolia, where trained physicians are scarce. This study aimed to compare the quality and interpretation of hip ultrasound screening examinations performed by nurses and junior physicians.

methodsA group of 6 nurses and 6 junior physician volunteers with no previous ultrasound experience underwent Graf's standard training in hands-on practice. Newborns were examined before discharge from the hospital, according to the national guideline. Two standard documentation images of each hip were saved digitally. The groups were compared on the proportion of good quality of sonograms and correct interpretation. Two Swiss supervisors' agreed diagnosis according to Graf was considered the final reference for the study purposes.

resultsA total of 201 newborns (402 hips or 804 sonograms) were examined in the study, with a mean age of 1.3±0.8 days at examination. Junior physicians examined 100 newborns (200 hips or 400 sonograms), while nurses examined 101 newborns (202 hips or 404 sonograms). The study subjects of the two groups were well balanced for the distribution of baseline characteristics. The study observed no statistically significant difference in the quality of Graf's standard plane images between the providers. Eventually, 92.0% (92) of the physician group and 89.1% (90) of the nurse group were correctly diagnosed as "Group A" (Graf's Type 1 hip) or "Non-Group A" hips (p = 0.484). The most common errors among the groups were a missing lower limb, wrong measurement lines, and technical problems.

conclusionOur study provides evidence that while there might be a trend of slightly more technical mistakes in the nurse group, the overall diagnosis accuracy is similar to junior physicians after receiving standard training in Graf's hip ultrasound method. However, after basic training, regular quality control is a must and all participants should receive refresher trainings. More specifically, nurses need training in the identification of anatomical structures.

Indexed as

Developmental Dysplasia of the HipHip Dislocation, CongenitalHip JointHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNeonatal ScreeningUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID38635681
PMCPMC11025947
OpenAlexW4394933494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.