Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38635636›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Differences in enantiomeric diffusion can lead to selective chiral amplification.

Jean Gillet, Yves Geerts, Laurence Rongy, Yannick De Decker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jean GilletNonlinear Physical Chemistry Unit, Faculté des Sciences, CP - 231, Université libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles 1050, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2888-0209
Yves GeertsLaboratoire de Chimie des Polymères, Faculté des Sciences, Université libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles 1050, Belgium.
Laurence RongyNonlinear Physical Chemistry Unit, Faculté des Sciences, CP - 231, Université libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles 1050, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3556-7045
Yannick De DeckerNonlinear Physical Chemistry Unit, Faculté des Sciences, CP - 231, Université libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles 1050, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7493-9657

Funding

FNRS | Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l'Industrie et dans l'Agriculture (FRIA) FC 38973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental question associated with chirality is how mixtures containing equal amounts of interconverting enantiomers can spontaneously convert to systems enriched in only one of them. Enantiomers typically have similar chemical properties, but can exhibit distinct reactivity under specific conditions, and these differences can be used to bias the system's composition in favor of one enantiomer. Transport properties are also expected to differ for enantiomers in chiral solvents, but the role of such differences in chiral symmetry breaking has not been clarified yet. In this work, we develop a theoretical framework to show that asymmetry in diffusion properties can trigger a spontaneous and selective symmetry breaking in mixtures of enantiomers. We derive a generic evolution equation for the enantiomeric excess in a chiral solvent. This equation shows that the relative stability of homochiral domains is dictated by the difference of diffusion coefficients of the two enantiomers. Consequently, deracemization toward a specific enantiomeric excess can be achieved when this difference is large enough. These results hold significant implications for our understanding of chiral symmetry breaking.

Indexed as

deracemizationhomochiralitynonlinear chemistryorigin of lifereaction–diffusion

Identifiers

PMID38635636
PMCPMC11046698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.