ArticlePloS one2024
Using emulated clinical trials to investigate the risk of being diagnosed with psychiatric ill health following the cancer diagnosis of a sibling.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe sibling bond is often the longest relationship in an individual's life, spanning both good and bad times. Focusing on the latter, we investigated whether a cancer diagnosis in one adult sibling is predictive of psychiatric illness in the other, and if any such effect differs according the 'sociodemographic closeness' between the siblings in terms of sex, age, education, marital status and residence.
methodsWe used hospital records to identify psychiatric diagnoses (2005-2019) in a Swedish total-population cohort born in 1953, and cancer diagnoses (2005-2017) in their full siblings. By means of emulated clinical trials, the cohort member's risk of a diagnosis within two years following a first exposure (or non-exposure) to a sibling's cancer was analyzed through Cox regression.
resultsExposed cohort members had a higher risk of psychiatric diagnosis than unexposed (HR = 1.15; CI: 1.08-1.23), with men displaying a higher risk (1.19; CI: 1.09-1.31) than women (HR = 1.11; CI: 1.01-1.22). Sub-analyses of the exposed group showed that women with a cancer-stricken sister had a higher risk of adverse psychiatric outcomes (HR = 1.31; CI: 1.07-1.61) than women with a cancer-stricken brother. Furthermore, unmarried cohort members ran a higher risk, both when the cancer-stricken sibling was married (HR = 2.03; CI: 1.67-2.46) and unmarried (HR = 2.61; CI: 2.16-3.15), than in cases where both siblings were married. No corresponding difference were detected for 'closeness' in age, education and residence.
conclusionsIn line with theories of linked lives, our findings suggest that negative events in one sibling's life tend to 'spill over' on the other sibling's wellbeing, at least during the 15-year-long period leading up to retirement age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.