Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38635584›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

How are people coping with working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic?: Experiences from the Netherlands and South Korea.

So Yeon Park, Rachel Lee, Caroline Newton, Gisung Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

So Yeon ParkDepartment of Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3960-0137
Rachel LeeDepartment of Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Delft, The Netherlands.
Caroline NewtonDepartment of Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0537-4373
Gisung HanInstitute of Engineering Research, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8342-5527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 has made working from home routine for many. People who have had to maintain their productivity, particularly in physically and/or socially unacceptable home-working situations, experienced one of the pandemic's disadvantages. The experience can vary substantially among individuals as well as by country. This study presents the results of a comparative study of the Netherlands and Korea. Working from home was not uncommon in the Netherlands before the pandemic; however, in Korea, employers adopted working from home from its start, and that increased rapidly. An online survey enabled us to compare the physical and social conditions of current home workspaces in both countries, to understand how well-equipped they were to support people who had to work from home. We studied the changes in productivity and physical/mental health before and during COVID-19, to learn how people coped with working from home in both countries. Contrary to expectations, Koreans showed better scores than people in the Netherlands, in terms of changes in health and productivity. This article discusses various aspects of that result, such as satisfaction with home workspace, housing type, job position and prior experience, compulsoriness, and frequency of working from home. Relieving stress and concentration appeared to be the most important dimensions of telecommuters' satisfaction with working from home environments in both countries. The results are the basis for suggesting the development of strategies for a desirable WFH environment, considering different background contexts, experiences and cultures.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCoping SkillsHumansNetherlandsRepublic of Korea

Identifiers

PMID38635584
PMCPMC11025775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.