Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38635536›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Biochar dispersion in a tropical soil and its effects on native soil organic carbon.

Alfred Obia, Jing Lyu, Jan Mulder, Vegard Martinsen, Gerard Cornelissen, Andreas Botnen Smebye, Andrew R Zimmerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alfred ObiaDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Gulu University, Gulu, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-0960-7020
Jing LyuDepartment of Geological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Jan MulderFaculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management (MINA), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Aas, Norway.
Vegard MartinsenFaculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management (MINA), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Aas, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7096-1806
Gerard CornelissenFaculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management (MINA), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Aas, Norway.
Andreas Botnen SmebyeNorwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI), Oslo, Norway.
Andrew R ZimmermanDepartment of Geological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5137-4916

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although biochar application to soils has been found to increase soil quality and crop yield, the biochar dispersion extent and its impacts on native soil organic carbon (SOC) has received relatively little attention. Here, the vertical and lateral migration of fine, intermediate and coarse-sized biochar (<0.5, 0.5-1 and 1-5 mm, respectively), applied at low and high doses (1.5-2 and 3-4% w/w, respectively), was tracked using stable isotope methods, along with its impact on native SOC stocks. Biochar was homogeneously mixed into the surface layer (0-7 cm depth) of a loamy sandy Acrisol in Zambia. After 4.5 y, 38-75% of the biochar carbon (BC) was lost from the applied layer and 4-25% was detected in lower soil layers (7-30 cm). Estimating BC mineralization to be no more than 8%, 25-60% was likely transported laterally out of the experimental plots. This conclusion was supported by observations of BC in the control plot and in soils up to 2 m outside of the experimental plots. These processes were likely progressive as recovery of BC in similar plots 1 year after application was greater in both surface and lower soil layers than after 4.5 y. Fine and intermediate-sized BC displayed the greatest downward migration (25.3 and 17.9%, respectively), particularly when applied at lower doses, suggesting its movement through soil inter-particle spaces. At higher dosages, fine and intermediate-sized particles may have clogged pore, so coarse biochar displayed the greatest downward migration when biochar was applied at higher doses. In the BC treatment plot soil profiles, native SOC stocks were reduced by 2.8 to 24.5% (18.4% on average), i.e. positive priming. However, some evidence suggested that the soils may switch to negative priming over time. The dispersion of biochar in soil should be considered when evaluating biochar's agronomic benefits and environmental effects.

Indexed as

CarbonSoilAgricultureCharcoalbiocharCarbonCharcoalSoil

Identifiers

PMID38635536
PMCPMC11025871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.