Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38635282›Full record

ArticleJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2024

Reconstruction for Salvage Laryngectomy With Limited Pharyngectomy.

Mauricio A Moreno, Mark K Wax, James Reed Gardner, Steven B Cannady, Evan M Graboyes, Arnaoud F Bewley, Peter T Dziegielewski, Sobia F Khaja, Rodrigo Bayon, Jesse Ryan and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 17 institutions in 2 countries.

Mauricio A MorenoDivision of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.
Mark K WaxDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
James Reed GardnerDivision of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.
Steven B CannadyDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Evan M GraboyesDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Arnaoud F BewleyDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Davis.
Peter T DziegielewskiDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Sobia F KhajaDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Rodrigo BayonDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Jesse RyanDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, State University of New York System, Syracuse.
Samer Al-KhudariDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Mark W El-DeiryDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory Health Care, Atlanta, Georgia.
Tamer A GhanemDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Andrew HuangDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Rusha PatelDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Oklahoma, Norman.
Kevin M HigginsDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ryan S JacksonDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Urjeet A PatelDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USBaylor College of Medicine · USEmory Healthcare · USHenry Ford Health System · USMedical University of South Carolina · USNorthwestern University · USOregon Health & Science University · USRush University Medical Center · USState University of New York · USSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Oklahoma · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Closure technique for optimization of postoperative and functional outcomes following salvage laryngectomy remains an area of debate among head and neck surgeons. Objective: To investigate the association of salvage laryngectomy closure technique with early postoperative and functional outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included patients from 17 academic, tertiary care centers who underwent total laryngectomy with no or limited pharyngectomy after completing a course of definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy with curative intent between January 2011 and December 2016. Patients with defects not amenable to primary closure were excluded. Data were analyzed from February 14, 2021, to January 29, 2024. Exposures: Total laryngectomy with and without limited pharyngectomy, reconstructed by primary mucosal closure (PC), regional closure (RC), or free tissue transfer (FTT). Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients were stratified on the basis of the pharyngeal closure technique. Perioperative and long-term functional outcomes were evaluated with bivariate analyses. A multivariable regression model adjusted for historical risk factors for pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) was used to assess risk associated with closure technique. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs were determined. Results: The study included 309 patients (256 [82.8%] male; mean age, 64.7 [range, 58.0-72.0] years). Defects were reconstructed as follows: FTT (161 patients [52.1%]), RC (64 [20.7%]), and PC (84 [27.2%]). A PCF was noted in 36 of 161 patients in the FTT group (22.4%), 25 of 64 in the RC group (39.1%), and 29 of 84 in the PC group (34.5%). On multivariable analysis, patients undergoing PC or RC had a higher risk of PCF compared with those undergoing FTT (PC: RR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.1-4.4]; RC: RR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.3-4.8]). Undergoing FTT was associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in risk of PCF (RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9; number needed to treat, 7). Subgroup analysis comparing inset techniques for the RC group showed a higher risk of PCF associated with PC (RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.0) and predominately pectoralis myofascial flap with onlay technique (RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.2), but there was no association of pectoralis myocutaneous flap with cutaneous paddle interposition with PCF (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.5-2.8) compared with FTT with cutaneous inset. There were no clinically significant differences in functional outcomes between the groups. Conclusion and Relevance: In this study of patients with limited pharyngeal defects, interpositional fasciocutaneous closure technique was associated with reduced risk of PCF in the salvage setting, which is most commonly achieved by FTT in academic practices. Closure technique was not associated with functional outcomes at 1 and 2 years postoperatively.

Indexed as

Laryngeal NeoplasmsLaryngectomyPharyngectomySalvage TherapyAgedCutaneous FistulaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPharyngeal DiseasesPlastic Surgery ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38635282
PMCPMC11177165
OpenAlexW4394914308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.