Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38635271›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Anxiety During Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Chunyan Li, Mingshu Tao, Dexian Chen, Qi Wei, Xingyu Xiong, Wenxin Zhao, Wen Tan, Jie Yang, Yuan Han, Hongxing Zhang and 3 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06791551 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Non-pharmacologial, Non-invassive Intervention Before Cardiac Surgry: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChina National Center for Cardiovascular DiseasesRan2025 to 2028Enrolled200ConditionsCardiac SurgeryArmsactive RIPC and tDCS, Sham (No Treatment)
NCT07576517 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Perioperative Use of Dexmedetomidine-esketamine Combination and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Prevention of Neurocognitive Complications in Older Patients After Non-cardiac Surgery: a 2×2 Factorial Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2026 to 2030Enrolled1,160ConditionsOlder Patients, Surgery, Dexmedetomidine, EsketamineArmsDex-Esk, Placebo, Active tDCS, Sham tDCS
NCT07576543 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Long-term Follow-up of Perioperative Dexmedetomidine-esketamine Combination and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Prevention of Neurocognitive Complications in Older Patients After Non-cardiac Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2026 to 2031Enrolled1,160ConditionsOlder Patients, Surgery, Dexmedetomidine, EsketamineArmsDex-Esk, Placebo, Active tDCS, Sham tDCS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Lymph node dissection, pain, and psychological factors: association with sleep quality during the perioperative period in oral cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Frailty Matters-Why Isn't It Guiding Clinical Decisions?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Chunyan LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Mingshu TaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Dexian ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Qi WeiDepartment of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Xingyu XiongDepartment of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Wenxin ZhaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Wen TanDepartment of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Jie YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Yuan HanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hongxing ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Song ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital and Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
He LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology & Clinical Research Center for Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, China.
Jun-Li CaoNational Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Narcotic and Psychotropic Drugs, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Xuzhou Medical College · CNNational Medical Products Administration · CNEye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University · CNHuzhou Central Hospital · CNRenji Hospital · CNZhejiang Chinese Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Perioperative anxiety is prevalent among patients undergoing surgical treatment of cancer and often influences their prognosis. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown potential in the treatment of various anxiety-related disorders, but data on the impact of tDCS on perioperative anxiety are limited. Objective: To evaluate the effect of tDCS in reducing perioperative anxiety among patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer (CRC) resection. Design, Setting, And Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted from March to August 2023 at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University. Patients aged 18 years or older undergoing elective laparoscopic radical resection for CRC were randomly assigned to either the active tDCS group or the sham tDCS group. Intention-to-treat data analysis was performed in September 2023. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 2 sessions of either active tDCS or sham tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on the afternoon of the day before the operation and in the morning of the day of operation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the incidence of perioperative anxiety from the day of the operation up to 3 days after the procedure, as measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A) subscale (range: 0-21, with higher scores indicating more anxiety). Secondary outcomes included postoperative delirium (assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method or Confusion Assessment Method intensive care unit scale); pain (assessed by the 10-point Numeric Rating Scale [NRS], with scores ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain]); frailty (assessed by the Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illness and Loss of Weight [FRAIL] Index, with scores ranging from 0 [most robust] to 5 [most frail]; and sleep quality (assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI], with scores ranging from 0 to 21 and higher scores indicating worse sleep quality) after the 2 sessions of the tDCS intervention. Results: A total of 196 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.5 [11.0] years; 124 [63.3%] men) were recruited and randomly assigned to the active tDCS group (98 patients) or the sham tDCS group (98 patients). After the second tDCS intervention on the day of the operation, the incidence of perioperative anxiety was 38.8% in the active tDCS group and 70.4% in the sham tDCS group (relative risk, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.42-0.73]; P < .001). Patients in the active tDCS group vs the sham tDCS group were less likely to have postoperative delirium (8.2% vs 25.5%) and, at 3 days after the operation, had lower median (IQR) pain scores (NRS, 1.0 [1.0-1.0] vs 2.0 [2.0-2.0]), better median (IQR) sleep quality scores (PSQI, 10.5 [10.0-11.0] vs 12.0 [11.0-13.0]), and lower median (IQR) FRAIL Index (2.0 [1.0-2.0] vs 2.0 [2.0-3.0]). Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this randomized clinical trial indicate that administration of 2 preoperative sessions of tDCS was associated with a decreased incidence of perioperative anxiety in patients undergoing elective CRC resection. Active tDCS was also associated with better anxiety scores, pain levels, and sleep quality as well as reduced postoperative delirium and frailty. The findings suggest that tDCS may be a novel strategy for improving perioperative anxiety in patients undergoing CRC resection. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Register Identifier: ChiCTR2300068859.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEmergence DeliriumFrailtyLaparoscopyTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAgedAnxietyFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain

Identifiers

PMID38635271
PMCPMC12527477
OpenAlexW4394914072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.