Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38635082›Full record

Observational studyBreast cancer research and treatment2024

Sentinel lymph node biopsy before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cN0 breast cancer patients: impact on axillary morbidity and survival-a propensity score cohort study.

Sergi Fernandez-Gonzalez, Catalina Falo, Maria J Pla, Miriam Campos, Carlos Ortega-Exposito, Raul Ortega, Maria Vicente, Ana Petit, Jan Bosch-Schips, Maria Teresa Bajen and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. De-escalation of axillary interventions in the management of breast cancer patients following neoadjuvant systemic treatment.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sergi Fernandez-GonzalezDepartment of Gynecology, Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Idibell, c/ Feixa Llarga s/n. Hospitalet de Llobregat, CP: 08907, Barcelona, Spain. sfernandezg@bellvitgehospital.cat.
Catalina FaloDepartment of Medical Oncology, Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Idibell, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria J PlaDepartment of Gynecology, Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Idibell, c/ Feixa Llarga s/n. Hospitalet de Llobregat, CP: 08907, Barcelona, Spain.
Miriam CamposDepartment of Gynecology, Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Idibell, c/ Feixa Llarga s/n. Hospitalet de Llobregat, CP: 08907, Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos Ortega-ExpositoDepartment of Gynecology, Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Idibell, c/ Feixa Llarga s/n. Hospitalet de Llobregat, CP: 08907, Barcelona, Spain.
Raul OrtegaDepartment of Radiology, Multidisciplinary, Breast Cancer Unit. Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Idibell, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria VicenteDepartment of Radiology, Multidisciplinary, Breast Cancer Unit. Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Idibell, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana PetitDepartment of Pathology, Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Idibell, Barcelona, Spain.
Jan Bosch-SchipsDepartment of Pathology, Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Idibell, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria Teresa BajenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Idibell, Barcelona, Spain.
Gabriel ReyesDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Idibell, Barcelona, Spain.
Evelyn MartínezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain.
Javier González-VigueraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain.
Judith PeñafielBiostatistics Unit, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Agostina StradellaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Idibell, Barcelona, Spain.
Sonia PernasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Idibell, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi PonceDepartment of Gynecology, Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Idibell, c/ Feixa Llarga s/n. Hospitalet de Llobregat, CP: 08907, Barcelona, Spain.
Amparo Garcia-TejedorDepartment of Gynecology, Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Idibell, c/ Feixa Llarga s/n. Hospitalet de Llobregat, CP: 08907, Barcelona, Spain.
Bellvitge University Hospital · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn patients with clinically lymph node-negative (cN0) breast cancer, performing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been preferentially embraced in comparison to before NACT. However, survival outcomes associated with both strategies remain understudied. We aimed to compare the axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) rate, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS), between two strategies.

methodsWe included 310 patients in a retrospective observational study. SNLB was performed before NACT from December 2006 to April 2014 (107 cases) and after NACT from May 2014 to May 2020 (203 patients). An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was applied to homogenize both groups. Hazard ratios (HR) and odd ratios (OR) are reported with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).

resultsThe lymphadenectomy rate was 29.9% before NACT and 7.4% after NACT (p < 0.001), with an OR of 5.35 95%CI (2.7-10.4); p = .002. After 4 years of follow-up, SLNB after NACT was associated with lower risk for DFS, HR 0.42 95%CI (0.17-1.06); p = 0.066 and better OS, HR 0.21 CI 95% (0.07-0.67); p = 0.009 than SLNB before NACT. After multivariate analysis, independent adverse prognostic factors for OS included SLNB before NACT, HR 3.095 95%CI (2.323-4.123), clinical nonresponse to NACT, HR 1.702 95% CI (1.012-2.861), and small tumors (cT1) with high proliferation index, HR 1.889 95% (1.195-2.985).

conclusionPerforming SLNB before NACT results in more ALND and has no benefit for patient survival. These findings support discontinuing the practice of SLNB before NACT in patients with cN0 breast cancer.

Indexed as

AxillaBreast NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionNeoadjuvant TherapyPropensity ScoreSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMiddle AgedAxillary lymph node dissectionBreast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapySentinel lymph node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID38635082
PMCPMC11182812
OpenAlexW4394917899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.