ArticleNeurosurgical review2024
Nomogram-based geometric and hemodynamic parameters for predicting the growth of small untreated intracranial aneurysms.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that the growth status of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) predisposes to rupture. This study aimed to construct a nomogram for predicting the growth of small IAs based on geometric and hemodynamic parameters. We retrospectively collected the baseline and follow-up angiographic images (CTA/ MRA) of 96 small untreated saccular IAs, created patient-specific vascular models and performed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Geometric and hemodynamic parameters were calculated. A stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was employed to construct a nomogram. IAs were stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups based on the total points from the nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA) and Kaplan-Meier curves were evaluated for internal validation. In total, 30 untreated saccular IAs were grown (31.3%; 95%CI 21.8%-40.7%). The PHASES, ELAPSS, and UIATS performed poorly in distinguishing growth status. Hypertension (hazard ratio [HR] 4.26, 95%CI 1.61-11.28; P = 0.004), nonsphericity index (95%CI 4.10-25.26; P = 0.003), max relative residence time (HR 1.01, 95%CI 1.00-1.01; P = 0.032) were independently related to the growth status. A nomogram was constructed with the above predictors and achieved a satisfactory prediction in the validation cohort. The log-rank test showed significant discrimination among the Kaplan-Meier curves of different risk groups in the training and validation cohorts. A nomogram consisting of geometric and hemodynamic parameters presented an accurate prediction for the growth status of small IAs and achieved risk stratification. It showed higher predictive efficacy than the assessment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.