Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38635044›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2024

Federated data access and federated learning: improved data sharing, AI model development, and learning in intensive care.

Michel E van Genderen, Maurizio Cecconi, Christian Jung

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of the SMS-ICU score for multicontinental use: A federated external validation study using critical care registry data.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evolving concepts in intracranial pressure monitoring - from traditional monitoring to precision medicine.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michel E van GenderenDepartment of Adult Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, (internal postadress-Room Ne-403), Doctor molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.vangenderen@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-5668-3435
Maurizio CecconiBiomedical Sciences Department, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Christian JungMedical Faculty, Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Critical CareInformation DisseminationArtificial IntelligenceHumans

Identifiers

PMID38635044
PMCPMC11164808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.